Acura Integra II 1.8 160HP vs Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual

Acura Integra II 1.8 160HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Acura Integra II, model available from 1989 to 1993.
It has 1.8 160HP petrol engine produced from 1989 to 1993.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Toyota MR2 II, model available from 1989 to 2000.
It has 2.0 16V 156HP petrol engine produced from 1989 to 2000.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual
Acura

9 reasons for Acura Integra II 1.8 160KM in comparison to Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 156 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Acura Integra II which has by 4 horsepower more in comparison to the Toyota MR2 II, which makes this car slightly faster. Having more horsepower the Acura Integra II should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
22

Width

1,715 > 1,705 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Acura Integra II is 10 mm wider when compared to the Toyota MR2 II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,550 > 2,408 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Acura Integra II has 6 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Toyota. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Acura Integra II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,383 > 4,180 mm
The Acura Integra II is 203 millimeters longer in comparison to the Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual. The length of the car is significant in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Acura Integra II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Acura Integra II will be better driven ,however, the Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,472 > 1,470 mm
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Acura Integra II 1.8 160HP gets an extra door at the back of a car. It will enable him to put things into a boot in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of big size. Passages of both cars who are to seat in the rear need to enter a car through a front door which needs folding a front seat.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,325 > 1,240 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Acura Integra II, which is by 85 mm higher than the Toyota MR2 II, would be better option for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Front track

1,475 > 1,450 mm

Toyota

1 reason for Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156KM manual in comparison to Acura Integra II 1.8 160HP

Reasons for
0

End of model sale

2000 > 1993

Cars specifications

Acura Integra II 1.8 160HP Toyota MR2 II 2.0 16V 156HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 1989 1989
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload - 1,156 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK