BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual vs Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30, model available from 2012.
It has 320d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4, model available from 2003 to 2007.
It has 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
BMW

22 reasons for BMW Seria 3 F30 Limuzyna F30 320d 184KM manual in comparison to Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 150 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual that has by 23 percent horsepower more in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4, which makes this car a bit faster. Due to more horsepower the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

4.3 > 7.3 l
The BMW uses 3 liters fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Alfa Romeo. The difference at the level of 3 liters will be quite realy noticeable in everyday usage of the car. In the long period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

381 > 305 Nm
The BMW 3-Series F30 has 76 Nm more torque in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. Although most of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is not really big so the difference will not be much noticeable.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 9.1 l
The BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual burns up 3.1 l fewer fuel while driving inside city than the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. The difference at the level of 34 % is really perceptible in daily use of the automobile. But, in a long term it will even bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 10.5 s
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual fits you better because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3 sek faster in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4.
33

Top speed

235 > 192 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​BMW is greater in relation to of the Alfa Romeo by 22, which allows the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual to overcome quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 43 kilometers per hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is good to see a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.7 > 5.9 l
22

Width

1,810 > 1,760 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 is 50 mm wider when compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,333 > 704 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 51 l
In this category it is the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 which can hold 16 % more fuel compared with the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. The average fuel container capacity in the large family cars class, which is represented by the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual, is 63 l, whereas in mid-size class (represented by the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4) it equals 63 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,807 > 2,595 mm
The BMW has 8 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. Consequently the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

1,034 > 538 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,579 > 862 km
8

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,911 cc
The BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 has 4 percent larger engine displacement than the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4. As the difference is small, the BMW 3-Series F30 should accelerate only a bit faster, of course if other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,620 > 4,445 mm
The BMW is 175 millimeters longer in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have plenty of trunk space. While the BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual seems to be better choice for families or those who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 may appeal to singles as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,583 > 1,502 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 2003
Manufacture of the older car began much more earlier than Alfa Romeo thus it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle has significantly less advanced parts .
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,529 mm
0

Front overhang

775 > 951 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Alfa Romeo

7 reasons for Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual

Reasons for
8

Maximum load capacity

495 > 475 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Alfa Romeo, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats giving more space for cargo, has the edge over the 4-door BMW which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,497 > 1,431 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Alfa Romeo, which is by 5 percent higher than the BMW 3-Series F30, would be better choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

2,020 > 1,975 kg
0

Rear overhang

892 > 1,037 mm
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,532 > 1,495 kg

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series F30 Limousine F30 320d 184HP manual Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Code name F30-F31-F34 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK