Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual vs Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

22 reasons for

Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan, model available from 2005 to 2010.
It has 2.0 TDI 140HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4, model available from 2003 to 2007.
It has 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
Volkswagen

22 reasons for Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140KM manual in comparison to Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.3 l
The Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual burns up 1.7 l less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. The difference at the level of 1.7 l will be perceptible in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

320 > 305 Nm
The Volkswagen has 15 Nm more torque than the Alfa Romeo. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

7 > 9.1 l
The fuel consumption in city traffic is distinctly to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan's advantage. This car burns 2.1 l fewer oil running around the town when compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.8 > 10.5 s
A small difference in the amount of 7 percent shows that the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „D class, being represented by the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4, the average acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 0.6 s higher than this of Alfa Romeo car.
38

Trunk capacity

565 > 360 l
With more boot size the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one compared with the Alfa Romeo. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Volkswagen Passat B6 will be better to choose because it is about 205 l more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Top speed

209 > 192 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Volkswagen is higher in comparison to this of the Alfa Romeo which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 17 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 5.9 l
22

Width

1,822 > 1,760 mm
Width of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan is widther by 4 percent than the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 and is not really relevant. The average for the „middle” segment amounts to around 1,764 mm and is by 3 percent larger than the width of the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual.
19

Range

1,250 > 704 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 51 l
The Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 loses with the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan is able to store by 37 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,714 > 2,595 mm
The Volkswagen Passat B6 has 119 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Alfa Romeo. Consequently the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

972 > 538 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,522 > 862 km
8

Engine capacity

1,968 > 1,911 cc
The Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan has 3 % bigger cubic capacity compared to the Alfa Romeo. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan should accelerate only a bit better, assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

606 > 495 kg
6

Length

4,765 > 4,445 mm
The Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan is 7 % longer in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Volkswagen Passat B6 very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Volkswagen will be better driven ,however, the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,553 > 1,502 mm
1

Model release date

2005 > 2003
Because of the fact that the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 was unveiled only 2 years earlier than the Volkswagen Passat B6, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual may feature slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Payload

2,060 > 2,020 kg
0

Front track

1,555 > 1,529 mm
0

End of model sale

2010 > 2007
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Alfa Romeo

8 reasons for Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Alfa Romeo 156 II is 7 % grater when compared to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual. As the difference is small it should not affect the car performance extensively.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,180 > 564 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 2,495 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always recommended to check a torque graph.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually means a hatchback and for that reason the Alfa Romeo 156 II, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats giving more space for cargo, has an advantage on the four-door Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,497 > 1,472 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Alfa Romeo 156 II, which is by 25 mm higher than the Volkswagen Passat B6, is better option for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Front overhang

951 > 966 mm
0

Rear overhang

892 > 1,091 mm
0

Curb weight

1,532 > 1,458 kg

Cars specifications

Volkswagen Passat B6 Sedan 2.0 TDI 140HP manual Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Code name B6 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK