Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual vs Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

23 reasons for

Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant, model available from 2005 to 2010.
It has 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP diesel engine produced from 2009 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4, model available from 2003 to 2007.
It has 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP diesel engine produced from 2004 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
Volkswagen

23 reasons for Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110KM manual in comparison to Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 7.3 l
The Volkswagen Passat B6 uses 2.4 l fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Alfa Romeo. The difference in the amount of 33 percent will be quite very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 9.1 l
The Volkswagen uses 3 liters of diesel less in the city compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II. The Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant, that comes from middle class, uses 4.5 l fewer oil, which is by 42 percent better result in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is really big, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should pick up cars of similar characteristics.
38

Trunk capacity

603 > 360 l
With more boot size the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one than the Alfa Romeo. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant will be better to buy because it is about 68 percent larger than the trunk of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,730 > 1,180 l
33

Top speed

196 > 192 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Volkswagen Passat B6 is greater in comparison to of the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 by 4 kilometers per hour, which allows the Volkswagen Passat B6 to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 % is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,745 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached indicates how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 5.9 l
22

Width

1,822 > 1,760 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant is 4 % wider in relation to the Alfa Romeo. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,429 > 704 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 51 l
The Alfa Romeo 156 II gives way to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual is able to take by 37 percent more fuel in comparison to the Alfa Romeo 156 II.
15

Wheelbase

2,714 > 2,595 mm
The Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual has 119 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Alfa Romeo. Consequently the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

1,111 > 538 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,707 > 862 km
8

Engine capacity

1,968 > 1,911 cc
The Volkswagen has by 57 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in relation to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

678 > 495 kg
6

Length

4,774 > 4,445 mm
The Volkswagen Passat B6 is 329 mm longer when compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Volkswagen occurs to be better option for families or persons who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Alfa Romeo 156 II may appeal to city drivers as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,553 > 1,502 mm
1

Model release date

2005 > 2003
Given that the Alfa Romeo 156 II debuted only 2 years prior to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Volkswagen Passat B6 might have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,517 > 1,497 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 20 mm to the advantage of the Volkswagen Passat B6 is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

2,160 > 2,020 kg
0

Front track

1,555 > 1,529 mm
0

End of model sale

2010 > 2007
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Alfa Romeo

8 reasons for Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 110 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Alfa Romeo 156 II which has by 36 percent more horsepower in relation to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant. Therefore the Alfa Romeo will reach higher top speed. Having more horsepower the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 should as well provide more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

305 > 250 Nm
Maximum torque of the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4 is 55 newton meters higher than the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant. Because of this, the Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 will accelerate a little bit faster and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Alfa Romeo will use on average less fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 12 s
The Volkswagen Passat B6 is relatively slower in relation to the Alfa Romeo. The difference at the level of 13 percent is quite low and for that reason it should not be substantially taken by you into as important for buying one of compared vehicles.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Alfa Romeo has a one more gear compared to the Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant. Generally this extra speed is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be shorter to give increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear as well helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

951 > 966 mm
0

Rear overhang

892 > 1,100 mm
0

Curb weight

1,532 > 1,486 kg

Cars specifications

Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant 2.0 TDI-CR DPF 110HP manual Alfa Romeo 156 II Crosswagon Q4 1.9 16V JTD M-Jet 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Code name B6 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK