Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic vs Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic

Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Ford Taurus IV Estate, model available from 1999 to 2007.
It has 3.0 i V6 201HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

6 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate, model available from 2003 to 2007.
It has 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic
Ford

21 reasons for Ford Taurus IV Kombi 3.0 i V6 201KM automat in comparison to Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

201 > 192 hp
The horsepower of the Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic is 9 hp bigger than the Alfa Romeo 156 II. While the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
112

Average consumption

8.4 > 12.4 l
The Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic consumes 32 % less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Alfa Romeo. The difference in the amount of 32 percent will be very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long period of time it can generate a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

281 > 218 Nm
Thanks to 29 % higher torque, the engine of the Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic. This, in turn, produces better acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

12 > 17.9 l
The Ford consumes 5.9 l fewer fuel running around the town when compared to the Alfa Romeo. The difference in the amount of 5.9 l is quite appreciable in everyday usage of the car. What is more, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on your driving style
38

Trunk capacity

1,085 > 360 l
The boot of the Ford Taurus IV is 725 liters more spacious compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic will be much more handy. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,298 > 1,180 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,500 > 5,005 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is reached determines how fast an engine achieves its best performance with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

1,859 > 1,738 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Ford Taurus IV Estate is widther by 121 millimeters compared with the Alfa Romeo 156 II and is not really important. The medium for the „D” segment is approximately 1,764 millimeters and is by 5 % larger than the width of the Ford Taurus IV.
19

Range

810 > 516 km
19

Fuel tank

67 > 64 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank capacity is Ford Taurus IV Estate that is able to carry by 3 l more gasoline in relation to the Alfa Romeo.
15

Wheelbase

2,751 > 2,595 mm
The Ford Taurus IV has 156 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Alfa Romeo. Consequently the Ford is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

576 > 348 km
8

Engine capacity

2,968 > 2,493 cc
The Ford Taurus IV has 475 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity than the Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic. For the reason that the difference is little, the Ford Taurus IV Estate should accelerate only slightly dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

5,022 > 4,445 mm
The Ford Taurus IV is 13 percent longer when compared to the Alfa Romeo 156 II. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. While the Ford seems to be better pick for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,574 > 1,496 mm
1

Height

1,468 > 1,430 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Ford Taurus IV Estate, which is by 3 % higher than the Alfa Romeo 156 II, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,511 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

1,588 > 1,437 kg

Alfa Romeo

6 reasons for Alfa Romeo 156 II Kombi 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192KM automat in comparison to Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic

Reasons for
33

Top speed

227 > 210 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Alfa Romeo is greater than of the Ford Taurus IV by 17 km/h, which allows the Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 17 km/h is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

8.9 > 10 l
11

Extra-urban range

716 > 680 km
1

Model release date

2003 > 1999
The difference in release date between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace what may cause that the Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

24 > 12

Cars specifications

Ford Taurus IV Estate 3.0 i V6 201HP automatic Alfa Romeo 156 II Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Q-System 192HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload - 1,945 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK