Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual vs Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual

Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Alfacevedoa All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Renault Safrane II, model available from 1996 to 2002.
It has 2.0 16V 138HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2002.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

15 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 166 I, model available from 1998 to 2001.
It has 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual
Renault

17 reasons for Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138KM manual in comparison to Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.3 > 9.9 l
The Renault Safrane II consumes 0.6 l less in the mixed cycle when compared to the Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual. The difference in the amount of 6 % is not very appreciable. However during a longer period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

12.7 > 13.6 l
The fuel consumption of the Renault is 7 percent smaller when compared to the Alfa Romeo 166 I. Despite the difference is small, in the long term it can make that the car would be significantly cheper to exploate.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7.1 > 7.4 l
19

Range

879 > 742 km
19

Fuel tank

81 > 73 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual that is able to carry by 8 liters more fuel in relation to the Alfa Romeo 166 I.
15

Wheelbase

2,772 > 2,690 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Renault Safrane II has 3 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Alfa Romeo. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

630 > 522 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,127 > 986 km
8

Maximum load capacity

600 > 510 kg
6

Length

4,769 > 4,716 mm
The Renault is 1 percent longer in relation to the Alfa Romeo 166 I. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Renault Safrane II will be better driven but the Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and for that reason the Renault, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat giving more space for cargo, has the edge over the four-door Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,433 > 1,417 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Renault Safrane II, which is by 1 % higher than the Alfa Romeo, would be better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,023 > 1,925 kg
0

End of model sale

2002 > 2001
0

Rear overhang

989 > 1,023 mm
0

Curb weight

1,427 > 1,422 kg

Alfa Romeo

15 reasons for Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155KM manual in comparison to Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 138 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual which has by 17 horsepower more than the Renault Safrane II, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Thanks to more horsepower the Alfa Romeo 166 I should also provide a bit more efficiency in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

187 > 182 Nm
The Alfa Romeo 166 I has 5 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual. Even though the majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it shows the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little so the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.6 > 10.5 s
The Renault speeds up relatively slower in comparison to the Alfa Romeo 166 I. The difference at the level of 0.9 s is is slightly to the Alfa Romeo 166 I advantage, however, it should not be strongly taken into consideration for buying one of compared cars.
38

Trunk capacity

490 > 455 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for journeys, which could hold more things in the boot , decide to buy the Alfa Romeo 166 I. The Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual has by 8 percent less capable luggage compartment than the Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual so in this case you would be able to carry one little suitcase less. Assessing the trunk also pay attention to its width length and height which have appreciable impact on loading capability .
33

Top speed

213 > 207 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Alfa Romeo 166 I is higher in comparison to this of the Renault Safrane II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,805 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine achieves its full output with increase in revolutions. The lower revolutions or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

1,815 > 1,790 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual is larger by 25 mm compared with the Renault Safrane II and is not really important. The average for the „upper middle” class amounts to 1,826 mm and is by 1 % bigger than the width of the Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual.
8

Engine capacity

1,971 > 1,949 cc
The Alfa Romeo has by 22 cc bigger cubic capacity when compared to the Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
4

Rear track

1,532 > 1,487 mm
1

Model release date

1998 > 1996
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Alfa Romeo may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Front track

1,548 > 1,530 mm
0

Front overhang

995 > 1,009 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Renault Safrane II 2.0 16V 138HP manual Alfa Romeo 166 I 2.0 i 16V T.Spark 155HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class E E
    Payload 2,023 kg 1,925 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK