Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual vs Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual

Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina, model available from 1958 to 1961.
It has 2.0 105HP petrol engine produced from 1958 to 1961.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

10 reasons for

Chevrolet Kalos, model available from 2004 to 2007.
It has 1.2 72HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual
Alfa Romeo

12 reasons for Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

105 > 72 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Alfa Romeo that has by 46 % more horsepower in relation to the Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual. Consequently the Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina is able to achieve higher velocity. Having more horsepower the Alfa Romeo 2000 should also provide seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

152 > 104 Nm
The Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual has 46 percent more torque in relation to the Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual. Even though a great deal of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how fast a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is quite big thus the Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual will give you better feeling of driving.
33

Top speed

160 > 157 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Alfa Romeo is greater in comparison to the Chevrolet Kalos by 3 kilometers/hour, which allows the Alfa Romeo 2000 to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 2 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,505 > 4,405 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is delivered determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always recommended to analyze a torque graph.
15

Wheelbase

2,571 > 2,484 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable car's weight distribution. Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual has 87 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Alfa Romeo 2000 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,975 > 1,150 cc
The Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina has 72 % bigger cubic capacity in relation to the Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size usually affects worst fuel consumption.
8

Maximum load capacity

500 > 465 kg
6

Length

4,392 > 3,880 mm
The Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina is 512 millimeters longer in comparison to the Chevrolet. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually provide bigger trunk. Although the Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Chevrolet may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,400 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,843 > 1,458 kg
0

Front overhang

761 > 815 mm
0

Curb weight

1,340 > 994 kg

Chevrolet

10 reasons for Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72KM manual in comparison to Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.4 > 10.7 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Chevrolet Kalos's advantage. This automobile uses 4.3 l less fuel in the combined cycle than the Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the B class, in which the Chevrolet Kalos is classified, equals to 6 l whereas the Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual consumes by 7 % more amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.7 > 14.3 s
The Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Chevrolet. The difference in the amount of 4 % is quite low and for that reason it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for selecting the better one of compared cars.
22

Width

1,670 > 1,564 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Chevrolet Kalos is 7 percent wider in comparison to the Alfa Romeo. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
4

Rear track

1,409 > 1,273 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually means a hatchback and as a result the Chevrolet, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats enlarging a luggage compartment, has an advantage on the four-door Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,494 > 1,431 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 4 % in favor of the Chevrolet Kalos is little and does not matter much.
1

Model release date

2004 > 1958
0

Front track

1,451 > 1,324 mm
0

End of model sale

2007 > 1961
0

Rear overhang

587 > 1,058 mm

Cars specifications

Alfa Romeo 2000 Berlina 2.0 105HP manual Chevrolet Kalos 1.2 72HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1958 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,843 kg 1,458 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK