The horsepower is a parameter that majority of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Alfa Romeo which has by 23 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Daihatsu Sirion II, which makes this vehicle a bit quicker. Thanks to more horsepower the Alfa Romeo MiTo should also provide a bit more flexiblility in specific gears.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Daihatsu Sirion II can reach the
speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared with the Alfa Romeo MiTo. The
difference at the level of
1 second is
quite low and for that
reason it should
not be vitally taken by you into
account when buying one of these two
With more trunk space the Alfa Romeo MiTo Hatchback 3d 0.9 TwinAir 85HP manual will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one compared with the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Alfa Romeo MiTo will be better choice as it is about 44 l larger than the trunk of the Daihatsu.
The top velocity of the Alfa Romeo MiTo is greater than of the Daihatsu Sirion II by 14 kilometers per hour, which allows the Alfa Romeo MiTo Hatchback 3d 0.9 TwinAir 85HP manual to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 14 kilometers/hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
distance between left and right side of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The width of the Alfa Romeo is larger only by 4 % than the Daihatsu Sirion II and is not really important. The average for the „supermini” class equals to around 1,645 millimeters and is by 4 percent larger than the width of the Alfa Romeo MiTo Hatchback 3d.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Alfa Romeo MiTo Hatchback 3d 0.9 TwinAir 85HP manual which can hold 18 % more fuel in comparison to the Daihatsu. The average fuel container capacity in the subcompact segment, from which the Alfa Romeo MiTo Hatchback 3d 0.9 TwinAir 85HP manual comes from, amounts to 44 l, whereas in B segment (represented by the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual) it equals 44 l.
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Alfa Romeo MiTo has 84 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Daihatsu Sirion II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Alfa Romeo MiTo should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
Number of gears
The Alfa Romeo MiTo have a higher gear count
in comparison to the Daihatsu Sirion II which means
that Alfa Romeo MiTo would achieve
faster acceleration and better fuel
economy. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag
racer at a timed event you would not even
feel the difference.
The Alfa Romeo MiTo is 457 mm longer than the Daihatsu Sirion II 1.0 i 12V 69HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Alfa Romeo MiTo very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Alfa Romeo will be better driven but the Daihatsu Sirion II will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
Model release date
The difference in release date between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Alfa Romeo MiTo may have more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.