Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual vs Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP

Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Audi 80 B2 Sedan, model available from 1978 to 1988.
It has 1.8 CC quattro 93HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1986.
Drive has manual, 4 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mazda 626 II Hatchback, model available from 1982 to 1987.
It has 1.6 75HP petrol engine produced from 1983 to 1987.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP
Audi

6 reasons for Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93KM manual in comparison to Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

93 > 75 hp
The horsepower of the Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual is 18 hp grater than the Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP. As the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
19

Fuel tank

67 > 60 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Audi 80 B2 Sedan which can comprise 12 % more fuel than the Mazda. The medium fuel container capacity in the large family cars class, from which the Audi 80 B2 comes from, is 63 liters, whereas in mid-size segment (represented by the Mazda 626 II) it equals 63 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,547 > 2,514 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Audi 80 B2 has 33 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mazda 626 II Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Audi 80 B2 Sedan should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,364 > 1,363 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 millimeter in favor of the Audi is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

End of model sale

1988 > 1987

Mazda

4 reasons for Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75KM in comparison to Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,690 > 1,680 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Mazda 626 II is widther only by 10 millimeters compared with the Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „large family cars” class amounts to approximately 1,764 mm and is by 74 mm smaller than the width of the Mazda 626 II.
6

Length

4,430 > 4,401 mm
The Mazda is 29 millimeters longer in comparison to the Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Mazda 626 II Hatchback very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mazda will be better driven ,however, the Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car generally means a hatchback and as a result the Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats making more room, has an advantage over the 4-door Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual which in turn has a smaller trunk cut off from the passenger compartment.
1

Model release date

1982 > 1978
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Mazda 626 II Hatchback may have more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.

Cars specifications

Audi 80 B2 Sedan 1.8 CC quattro 93HP manual Mazda 626 II Hatchback 1.6 75HP
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 1978 1982
    Facelifting no no
    Code name B2 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK