The fuel economy is distinctly to Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting's advantage. This vehicle burns 1.8 l fewer petrol in the mixed cycle when compared with the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the lower middle segment, in which the Skoda is classified, is 6.8 l whereas the Skoda burns up by 5 percent more fuel than the average.
The fuel economy in city traffic is considerably to the Skoda's advantage. This car consumes 20 percent less gasoline running around the town in relation to the Audi. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
The trunk of the Skoda Octavia II is 99 percent bigger in comparison to the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting 1.6 MPI LPG 102HP manual will be much more practical. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can hold.
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Skoda Octavia II is widther only by 1 mm than the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d 2.0 TFSI 265HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The average for the „compact” segment amounts to approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 63 millimeters larger than the width of the Skoda.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting 1.6 MPI LPG 102HP manual which can carry by 6 l more fuel compared with the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d.
The wheelbase of a car is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Skoda Octavia II has 7 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Audi A3 8P. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting 1.6 MPI LPG 102HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
Trunk length with seats up
Maximum load capacity
The Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting is 339 millimeters longer in relation to the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have more storage space. Although the Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting seems to be better choice for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Audi A3 8P may appeal to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
Number of doors
The three-door model of Audi A3 8P is easy to load and unload luggage into a trunk, whereas four-door Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting features more convenient getting into the car, more quiet cabin at the expense of smaller boot lid.
Model release date
Given that the Audi A3 8P was introduced only 1 year before the Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting 1.6 MPI LPG 102HP manual, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting might feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Skoda Octavia II Hatchback Facelifting, which is by 63 mm higher than the Audi A3 8P S3 Hatchback 3d, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.