Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual vs Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org David Villarreal Fernández Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

22 reasons for

Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 TFSI 105HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2006.
It has 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual
Audi

22 reasons for Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105KM manual in comparison to Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

105 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Audi that has by 17 % horsepower more when compared to the Fiat, which makes this vehicle slightly faster. Due to more horsepower the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d should as well give somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 6.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Audi A3 8V's advantage. This car burns 25 % less petrol in the combined cycle when compared with the Fiat. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact segment, in which the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d is classified, equals to 6.8 l whereas the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual consumes by 31 % less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

175 > 126 Nm
The Audi has 39 % more torque than the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. The difference at such level is quite big, what means that the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual will accelerate perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 8.1 l
The Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual uses 28 % fewer fuel running around the town in relation to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d. The difference in the amount of 2.3 l is really perceptible in everyday use of the vehicle. But, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on your driving style
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.3 > 12.5 s
The Audi can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 10.3 s, which is 18 % better result in relation to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
33

Top speed

193 > 179 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Audi is higher in comparison to this of the Fiat Bravo II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 8 % is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,400 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Audi. The engine of the Fiat Bravo II achieves its full efficiency at 4,500 revolutions per minute which is by 69 percent worst result compared with the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.4 > 5.3 l
19

Range

1,020 > 921 km
15

Wheelbase

2,607 > 2,594 mm
Audi has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

847 > 716 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,136 > 1,115 km
8

Gross trailer weight

1,499 > 996 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Manufacture of the older vehicle commenced 6 years prior to Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d and for this reason man may suspect that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less advanced solutions applied.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,542 > 1,538 mm
0

Front overhang

867 > 973 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,225 > 1,209 kg

Fiat

9 reasons for Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90KM manual in comparison to Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

400 > 363 l
If you are looking for a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could carry more luggage , choose the Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual. The Audi has by 37 liters smaller trunk than the Audi so in this case you would be able to load one little suitcase less. Assessing the luggage compartment check its width length and height which have notable effect on loading possibility .
22

Width

1,788 > 1,777 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Fiat is 11 millimeters wider than the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

57 > 49 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d which can take by 8 liters more petrol than the Audi A3 8V.
8

Engine capacity

1,368 > 1,196 cc
The Fiat has by 14 percent larger cubic capacity than the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,334 > 4,233 mm
The Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d is 101 mm longer when compared to the Audi A3 8V. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Fiat very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Fiat Bravo II will be better driven ,however, the Audi A3 8V will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,533 > 1,513 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual is more usable and if you regularly drive with more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Audi very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual may be better one.
1

Height

1,500 > 1,421 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Fiat Bravo II, which is by 79 mm higher than the Audi A3 8V, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Rear overhang

762 > 769 mm

Cars specifications

Audi A3 8V Hatchback 3d 1.2 TFSI 105HP manual Fiat Bravo II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V MPI 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,499 kg 996 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Code name 8V -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK