Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual vs Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thesupermat Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

12 reasons for

Mazda 6 III Estate, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Audi A4 B8 Avant, model available from 2007.
It has 1.8 TFSI 160HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual
Mazda

12 reasons for Mazda 6 III Kombi 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145KM manual in comparison to Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.4 > 7 l
The Mazda burns up 1.6 l fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the Audi A4 B8 Avant. The difference at the level of 1.6 l will be significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will result in a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7 > 9.5 l
The Mazda 6 III uses 2.5 l of gasoline less in city traffic in relation to the Audi A4 B8. The Mazda, which comes from middle segment, consumes 3.6 l fewer fuel, which constitutes by 34 percent better result in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in this category between compared vehicles is quite big, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should select vehicles with similar parameters.
38

Trunk capacity

506 > 488 l
The trunk of the Mazda is only 4 % bigger than the Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have similar trunk size.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.8 l
22

Width

1,845 > 1,831 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 6 III is 14 millimeters wider in comparison to the Audi. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,107 > 903 km
12

Urban range

861 > 677 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,319 > 1,121 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,797 cc
The Mazda has 11 % larger cubic capacity compared to the Audi. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual should accelerate a bit better, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,806 > 4,704 mm
The Mazda 6 III is 102 mm longer in relation to the Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Mazda probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual will be better driven but the Audi will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2007
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 5 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace what may cause that the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual may have more advanced solutions.
1

Height

1,475 > 1,438 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual, which is by 3 percent higher than the Audi, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Audi

11 reasons for Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 145 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Audi which has by 15 horsepower more than the Mazda 6 III, which makes this car slightly quicker. With more horsepower the Audi will also give slightly better efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

250 > 209 Nm
Maximum torque of the Audi A4 B8 Avant is 20 % greater than the Mazda. Because of this, the Audi A4 B8 will accelerate somewhat faster and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Audi A4 B8 will consume on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 9.6 s
The Audi accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 8.9 s, which is 7 % in relation to the Mazda 6 III. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
33

Top speed

218 > 206 km/h
The top velocity of the ‚Äč‚ÄčAudi A4 B8 Avant is greater compared with of the Mazda 6 III Estate by 6, which allows the Audi A4 B8 to travel faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 12 kilometers per hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual. The engine of the Mazda 6 III reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 63 % lower than the Audi.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 62 l
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual loses with the Audi in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Audi A4 B8 is able to carry by 2 l more fuel in comparison to its contender.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,045 > 1,980 kg
0

Front overhang

867 > 955 mm
0

Rear overhang

1,029 > 1,101 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual Audi A4 B8 Avant 1.8 TFSI 160HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 745 kg
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2012 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - B8
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK