Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual vs Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released

14 reasons for

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP diesel engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Audi A4 B8 Avant, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 TDI 140HP diesel engine produced from 2008 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released

14 reasons for Mercedes Klasa C W204 Kombi T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136KM manual in comparison to Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

112

Average consumption

5.4 > 5.6 l

The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting burns up 0.2 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Audi A4 B8 Avant. The Mercedes, being palced in „D” class burns up by 2.3 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.7 l.

Add a comment

Maximal torque

362 > 320 Nm

The Mercedes has 42 Nm more torque when compared to the Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4. Although the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it reflects the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is insensible and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.

Add a comment

Urban consumption

6.4 > 7 l

The Mercedes consumes 0.6 l less fuel in city traffic compared with the Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 9 % is very significant in daily using vehicle. Additionally, within years it will bring real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover note that medium results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably increased if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.

Add a comment

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 9.6 s

A little difference at the level of 1 percent indicates that the Audi is insensibly beaten in this confrontation. In the „D” class, to which the Audi A4 B8 is assigned, the medium acceleration is 9.9 s and is by 3 percent slower than acceleration of Audi’s car.

Add a comment

Maximal torque RPM

1,595 > 1,750 revolutions/minute

A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always recommended to analyze a torque performance graph.

Add a comment

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 5 l

Add a comment

Trunk length with seats up

1,038 > 1,028 mm

Add a comment

Engine capacity

2,143 > 1,967 cc

The Mercedes has by 176 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement in relation to the Audi A4 B8 Avant. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not vary much.

Add a comment

Maximum load capacity

540 > 515 kg

Add a comment

Height

1,459 > 1,438 mm

The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 21 mm in favor of the Mercedes C-Class W204 is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Add a comment

Maximal power RPM

2,800 > 4,200 revolutions/minute

Add a comment

Trunk height

786 > 774 mm

Add a comment

Sill height

591 > 633 mm

Add a comment

Front overhang

773 > 867 mm

Add a comment

Reasons for

135

Maximal power

140 > 136 hp

The horsepower of the Audi is 3 % grater in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W204. Because the difference is little it should not affect the car performance considerably.

Add a comment

Trunk capacity

488 > 485 l

If you are looking for a car for long cruises, which could contain more things in the boot , pick the Audi A4 B8 Avant 2.0 TDI 140HP manual 4x4. The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual has by 1 percent less capable trunk in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W204 so you would be able to take with you a bit less. When it comes to the trunk also pay attention to its dimensions which have substantial effect on loading possibility .

Add a comment

Width

1,831 > 1,774 mm

The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Audi is 3 % wider than the Mercedes C-Class W204. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.

Add a comment

Length

4,704 > 4,606 mm

The Audi is 2 % longer in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually provide more storage space. While the Audi seems to be better option for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Mercedes may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.

Add a comment

Rear track

1,551 > 1,544 mm

Add a comment

Model release date

2007 > 2006

The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Audi A4 B8 Avant may feature more modern solutions.

Add a comment