Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 vs Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Nozilla Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Audi Q3 RS Q3, model available from 2011.
It has 2.5 TFSI 310HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 7 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
Audi

15 reasons for Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

310 > 240 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Audi Q3 RS Q3 that has by 29 percent more horsepower when compared to the Land Rover. Consequently the Audi can achieve higher top speed. Due to more horsepower the Audi Q3 RS Q3 will as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

8.6 > 9.4 l
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 burns up 9 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The Audi, which is palced in „compact SUV” segment uses by 1.1 l more fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 338 Nm
The Audi Q3 has 82 Nm more torque in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II. Even though the majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a car, it reflects the best how a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is quite small and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

12.1 > 13.3 l
The Audi burns 1.2 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Land Rover Freelander II. The difference at the level of 9 % is quite significant in everyday use of car. Additionally, during several years it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Also you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably lifted if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.5 > 8.6 s
If a fast driving is what you are keen on, the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 will appeal to you because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3.1 s better in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II.
33

Top speed

250 > 200 km/h
The Land Rover has by 25 percent smaller top speed compared to the Audi, on account of which traveling a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on on the road without speed limits to the vehicle of Audi brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 1,750 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is produced determines how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.9 > 7.5 l
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

7 > 6 gears
The Audi have a higher gear count compared to the Land Rover Freelander II which means that Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 will achieve better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
8

Engine capacity

2,479 > 1,998 cc
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 has 24 percent greater cubic capacity than the Land Rover Freelander II. As the difference is small, the Audi should accelerate slightly dynamically, of course assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
1

Model release date

2011 > 2006
Given that the Land Rover was unveiled only 5 years prior to the Audi Q3, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Audi might have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
1

Trunk length with seats down

1,634 > 1,569 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Valves

20 > 16

Land Rover

10 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 356 l
The trunk of the Land Rover Freelander II is 112 % bigger than the Audi. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Land Rover Freelander II will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 1,262 l
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,610 mm
Land Rover Freelander II has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Audi Q3. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
11

Trunk length with seats up

913 > 878 mm
8

Gross trailer weight

2,003 > 1,902 kg
6

Length

4,500 > 4,415 mm
The Land Rover Freelander II is 2 % longer in comparison to the Audi Q3. Long cars are more spacious and also have more storage space. While the Land Rover occurs to be better for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Audi Q3 may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,576 mm
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,571 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,191 > 2,024 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,729 kg

Cars specifications

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,902 kg 2,003 kg
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2011 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK