Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Nozilla Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Audi Q3 RS Q3, model available from 2011.
It has 2.5 TFSI 310HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 7 speed gearbox.

14 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
Audi

20 reasons for Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

310 > 160 hp
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 has by 150 horsepowers more horsepower in relation to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. The Audi Q3 will be distinctly faster speed up owing to grater power. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 207 Nm
The difference at the level of 213 newton meters is really colossal thanks to which the Audi Q3 RS Q3 features much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up much more faster and has stronger towing capacity.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.5 > 10.5 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Audi Q3 RS Q3 is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 48 % faster in relation to the Mazda.
33

Top speed

250 > 197 km/h
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 has by 27 % higher top speed in comparison to the Mazda CX-5, thanks to which a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be covered much more faster. The difference may be perceptible during travelling on the road without speed limits.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that the winner is is this of the Audi. The engine of the Mazda CX-5 achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 2,505 revolutions per minute worst result compared with the Audi Q3 RS Q3.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 56 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 loses with the Audi Q3 RS Q3 in the field of fuel tank size. The Audi Q3 is able to store by 14 % more fuel than its competitor.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

7 > 6 gears
The Audi has only one extra speed compared to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. Usually the extra speed is used as an overdrive so that the previous speeds can be shorter to give increased acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear also helps to decrease fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

2,479 > 1,998 cc
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 has 24 percent bigger engine capacity than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. For the reason that the difference is little, the Audi should accelerate only slightly dynamically, of course if other paramerters are equal.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,902 > 1,803 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift that is placed in the Mazda is less complex construction and is cheaper in use but it is less comfortable because it requires the driver to operate clutch to shift speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a bussy city traffic where drivers have lots of frequent stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission which is installed in the Audi with gears in the amount of 7 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better to use.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Payload

2,219 > 2,000 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 726 kg
0

Front overhang

928 > 950 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Rear overhang

883 > 907 mm
0

Curb weight

1,729 > 1,500 kg

Mazda

14 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.4 > 8.6 l
The Mazda CX-5 burns up 2.2 l fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle than the Audi. The difference in the amount of 26 percent will be quite significant in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it will result in a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7.9 > 12.1 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 consumes 35 % less fuel in city traffic in comparison to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 4.2 l is quite appreciable in everyday use of the vehicle. But, in a long run it will even bring you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 356 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 has 147 liters bigger trunk than the Audi Q3 RS Q3. Such a difference is big so it will is relevant to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Mazda CX-5 has 58 liters bigger boot size than the average in its class. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,622 > 1,262 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 6.9 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,841 mm
Width of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Mazda CX-5 is widther only by 2 mm in comparison to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” class equals to 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 percent larger than the width of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4.
19

Range

848 > 739 km
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,610 mm
The Mazda CX-5 has 90 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3. Therefore the Mazda CX-5 is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

691 > 533 km
11

Extra-urban range

966 > 942 km
8

Maximum load capacity

500 > 485 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,415 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 122 millimeters longer than the Audi Q3. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. While the Mazda seems to be better choice for families or persons who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Audi may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,576 mm
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,571 mm

Cars specifications

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,902 kg 1,803 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK