Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Nozilla Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Audi Q3 RS Q3, model available from 2011.
It has 2.5 TFSI 310HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 7 speed gearbox.

14 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual
Audi

20 reasons for Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

310 > 165 hp
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 is equipped with petrol which produce by 145 more horsepower over the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It should be better option for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 209 Nm
The difference of 101 percent is really large thanks to which the Audi Q3 RS Q3 features much more better flexibility of the engine, it accelerates much more faster and has stronger towing power.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.5 > 9.2 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3.7 s better in relation to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual.
33

Top speed

250 > 200 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Audi Q3 RS Q3 is higher in comparison to this of the Mazda which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 50 kilometers per hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4. The engine of the Mazda CX-5 reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 63 percent lower than the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 56 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Audi Q3 RS Q3 which can contain 14 percent more fuel compared with the Mazda. The average fuel tank size in the mini 4x4 segment, from which the Audi Q3 RS Q3 comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Mazda) it equals 61 liters.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

7 > 6 gears
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 have a higher speed count compared with the Mazda CX-5 which means that Audi Q3 would achieve better acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not notice the difference.
8

Engine capacity

2,479 > 1,998 cc
The Audi has 24 percent bigger engine displacement in relation to the Mazda. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Audi should accelerate only slightly better, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,902 > 1,803 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For people who opt for more convenient use of a vehicle and don’t want complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. For those who enjoy sporting driving a manual gearbox may be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Payload

2,219 > 1,930 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 691 kg
0

Front overhang

928 > 950 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Rear overhang

883 > 907 mm
0

Curb weight

1,729 > 1,420 kg

Mazda

14 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 8.6 l
The Mazda CX-5 burns up 33 percent less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Audi. The difference at the level of 2.8 l will be significant in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long term it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 12.1 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual uses 40 percent fewer gasoline while driving inside city in relation to the Audi Q3. The difference in the amount of 4.8 l is quite significant in daily use of the automobile. But, in a long term it will even give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 356 l
With more boot size the Mazda will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull car compared with the Audi Q3. If the capacity of the trunk is appeals to you, the Mazda CX-5 will be better choice as it is about 41 percent larger than the boot of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,622 > 1,262 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.1 > 6.9 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,841 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is 2 millimeters wider in comparison to the Audi. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

933 > 739 km
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,610 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Mazda CX-5 has 3 percent longer wheelbase distance in relation to Audi Q3. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda CX-5 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

747 > 533 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,098 > 942 km
8

Maximum load capacity

510 > 485 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,415 mm
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is 122 mm longer in relation to the Audi Q3. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also provide more storage space. Although the Mazda CX-5 occurs to be better pick for families or persons who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 may appeal to women as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,576 mm
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,571 mm

Cars specifications

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,902 kg 1,803 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK