Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Nozilla Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

25 reasons for

Audi Q3 RS Q3, model available from 2011.
It has 2.5 TFSI 310HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 7 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Audi

25 reasons for Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

310 > 117 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Audi Q3, which has by 193 more horsepower when compared to the Mitsubishi, which makes this vehicle distinctly better in terms of top speed. Having more horsepower the Audi Q3 RS Q3 should as well give distinctly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 152 Nm
The difference at the level of 176 percent is really huge as a result of which the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 has much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up much more faster and has stronger towing power.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.5 > 11.4 s
The Audi speeds up to 100k\h by 52 percent quicker in relation to the Mitsubishi. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Audi Q3 will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

250 > 183 km/h
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 has by 37 % higher maximum velocity when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, as a result of which a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived much more faster. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Audi Q3 RS Q3. The engine of the Mitsubishi ASX reaches its full efficiency at 3,995 revolutions/minute which is by 62 percent worst result than the Audi Q3 RS Q3.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,770 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Audi is 4 percent wider in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 62 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Audi which can comprise 3 % more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. The average fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4, is 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Mitsubishi ASX) it amounts to 61 liters.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

7 > 5 gears
The Audi Q3 has a one extra speed in comparison to the Mitsubishi. Most often the extra gear is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower in order to allow increased performance in the lower speeds. One more gear as well affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

2,479 > 1,589 cc
The Audi has 56 percent bigger engine displacement in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. The difference is relatively large. Consequently the Audi should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement means worst fuel economy.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,902 > 1,102 kg
6

Length

4,415 > 4,296 mm
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 is 119 mm longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Audi Q3 seems to be better option for families or persons who value convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi ASX SUV may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,525 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2011 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi ASX debuted only 1 year prior to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Audi Q3 RS Q3 may feature slightly more modern solutions used in it.
1

Tire width

255 > 215 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Audi Q3 RS Q3 in spite of having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel the driver is less exhausted. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,219 > 1,869 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 746 kg
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,525 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Tire diameter

19 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

40 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,729 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 8.6 l
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual uses 2.4 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 28 % will be quite significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it will result in a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7.8 > 12.1 l
The fuel consumption running around the town is considerably to the Mitsubishi ASX's advantage. This vehicle uses 4.3 l less petrol in the city in comparison to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
38

Trunk capacity

418 > 356 l
If you need a car for long travels, which could load more luggage , choose the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. The Audi has by 62 l less capable boot in relation to the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 so probably you would be able to take with you one small parcel less. When it comes to the boot also pay attention to its width length and height which have notable effect on loading capability .
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 6.9 l
19

Range

1,050 > 739 km
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,610 mm
The Mitsubishi has 3 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3. Consequently the Mitsubishi is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

808 > 533 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,260 > 942 km
8

Maximum load capacity

625 > 485 kg

Cars specifications

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,902 kg 1,102 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK