Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Nozilla Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

25 reasons for

Audi Q3 RS Q3, model available from 2011.
It has 2.5 TFSI 310HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 7 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Audi

25 reasons for Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

310 > 115 hp
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 has by 195 hp more horsepower than Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to bigger power. Also getting ahead of obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 equipped with more powerful engine.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 190 Nm
The difference at the level of 230 Nm is really substantial as a result of which the Audi Q3 RS Q3 features much more better flexibility of the engine, it reaches high speed significantly faster and has stronger towing capacity.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.5 > 11.3 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the Audi Q3 is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 5.8 s better compared to the Nissan Qashqai II.
33

Top speed

250 > 183 km/h
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 has by 67 km/h higher maximum velocity when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, as a result of which a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine achieves its full output with increase in revolutions. The lower rotational speed or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,800 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 is 41 mm wider in comparison to the Nissan. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

64 > 54 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank size is Audi Q3 that is able to take by 10 l more fuel than the Nissan Qashqai II.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

7 > 6 gears
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 has only one extra gear in comparison to the Nissan. Sometimes the additional speed is a very tall one so that the previous gears can be narrower to give better performance in the lower gears. One more speed as well will casuse fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

2,479 > 1,198 cc
Obviously the Audi Q3 RS Q3 wins in the category of {engine capacity. The difference at the level of 107 % compared to engine of the Nissan Qashqai II. It is interesting that in „mini 4x4” segment, from which the Audi Q3 comes from, the average engine capacity equals 2,104 cc and the biggest cubic capacity in this class equals 4,201 .
8

Gross trailer weight

1,902 > 1,199 kg
6

Length

4,415 > 4,380 mm
The Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 is 1 % longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Audi occurs to be better option for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,563 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

255 > 215 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth travelling in the city, it is worth to have an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Rim width

8 > 6 mm
0

Payload

2,219 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 679 kg
0

Rim diameter

19 > 16 ″
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,564 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Tire diameter

19 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

40 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,729 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

11 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.6 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Nissan's advantage. This vehicle consumes 35 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Audi. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Nissan is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Nissan Qashqai II consumes by 25 % less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 12.1 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up 5.2 l fewer fuel in urban cycle compared with the Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 5.2 l is very big in daily use of car. Additionally, during several years it may give real and noticeable cost savings. Also keep in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption may be considerably raised if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 356 l
With more boot size the Nissan will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional one than the Audi Q3 RS Q3. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Nissan will be better choice as it is about 23 % larger than the trunk of the Audi.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6.9 l
19

Range

982 > 739 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,610 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has 1 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Audi Q3. Therefore the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

797 > 533 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 942 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 485 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Audi was unveiled only 3 years before the Nissan, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Nissan Qashqai II might have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,200 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Audi Q3 RS Q3 2.5 TFSI 310HP automatic 4x4 Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,902 kg 1,199 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK