BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual vs Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

22 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d 177HP diesel engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Fiat Croma II, model available from 2005 to 2010.
It has 1.8 16v 140HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual
BMW

22 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 320d 177KM manual in comparison to Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

177 > 140 hp
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 has by 26 % more horsepower compared to Fiat Croma II. The BMW 3-Series E90 will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate thanks to bigger horsepower. Also overtaking cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 7.4 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual's advantage. This car burns 2.7 l fewer oil in the combined cycle in relation to the Fiat. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the middle segment, in which the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual is classified, is 7.7 l while the BMW needs by 39 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

351 > 173 Nm
When you step on the gas and you start speeding up quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better driving the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 because it has 178 Nm more torque than the Fiat. Compared cars differ so much that only riding the BMW you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pressed back in the seat as the car accelerate.
56

Urban consumption

6.3 > 9.8 l
The BMW burns up 3.5 l less fuel in urban cycle than the Fiat Croma II. The difference at the level of 3.5 l is very big in everyday using car. Additionally, within many months it may give gigantic cost savings. Also bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably raised if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.8 > 10.2 s
A small difference at the level of 2.4 s suggests that the Fiat Croma II is slightly beaten here. In the „large family cars” class, to which the Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 0.3 s faster than acceleration of Fiat’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

232 > 206 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​BMW is greater in comparison to this of the Fiat Croma II by 13, which allows the BMW 3-Series E90 to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 26 km/h is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 3,800 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is delivered determines how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with increase in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 6.1 l
22

Width

1,784 > 1,779 mm
Width of a car affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the BMW 3-Series E90 is larger by 5 millimeters than the Fiat Croma II and is not really important. The average for the „D” class equals to approximately 1,764 mm and is by 20 millimeters larger than the width of the BMW.
19

Range

1,224 > 838 km
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,706 mm
BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 has 62 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Fiat Croma II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

984 > 633 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,429 > 1,033 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual has a one more speed in relation to the Fiat. Usually the extra gear is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower in order to give increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed also helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,796 cc
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 has by 198 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement when compared to the Fiat Croma II. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not vary much.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,498 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2010
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 55 %

Fiat

9 reasons for Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

502 > 439 l
The trunk of the Fiat is only 63 liters bigger than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both cars have similar trunk space.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 59 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Fiat Croma II that can carry by 3 percent more gasoline compared with the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92.
6

Length

4,756 > 4,580 mm
The Fiat is 4 percent longer when compared to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Fiat preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Fiat Croma II will be better driven but the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 will be a little easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and practical car is 5-door Fiat Croma II. The 2-door version of BMW 3-Series E90 has less pluses, apart from sporty design.
1

Model release date

2005 > 2004
Given that the BMW 3-Series E90's production started only 1 year prior to the Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Fiat might have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,597 > 1,393 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Fiat Croma II, which is by 15 percent higher than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92, is better pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,511 > 1,500 mm
0

Curb weight

1,425 > 1,420 kg

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 320d 177HP manual Fiat Croma II 1.8 16v 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,500 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK