BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual vs Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

19 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Chrysler Cirrus Coupe, model available from 1995 to 2000.
It has 2.0 i 16V 132HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual
BMW

19 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184KM manual in comparison to Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 132 hp
The BMW 3-Series E90 comes with diesel which produce by 39 % more horsepower than the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be better option for drivers who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 6.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual's advantage. This automobile burns 1.8 l less diesel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Chrysler Cirrus. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the middle class, in which the BMW is classified, equals to 7.7 l whereas the BMW 3-Series E90 needs by 42 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 10.9 s
If a swift driving is what you enjoy, the BMW will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 31 % better compared to the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual.
33

Top speed

237 > 205 km/h
The top speed of the ​​BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is greater compared with the Chrysler by 16, which allows the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 32 kilometers per hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
19

Range

1,340 > 938 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 59 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the BMW 3-Series E90 which can comprise 5 percent more fuel in relation to the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe. The average fuel container size in the large family cars class, which is represented by the BMW, amounts to 63 liters, whereas in large family cars segment (represented by the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual) it amounts to 63 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,745 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. BMW has 1 % longer wheelbase distance than Chrysler. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of BMW 3-Series E90 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting have a higher speed count than the Chrysler Cirrus which means that BMW 3-Series E90 should have faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not notice the difference.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 1995
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than its rival and for this reason man may suspect that this car has significantly less modern solutions used.
1

Height

1,393 > 1,374 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, which is by 1 percent higher than the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe, would be appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

225 > 185 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

4 > 2
0

Payload

1,904 > 1,884 kg
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2000
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,495 > 1,282 kg

Chrysler

5 reasons for Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,822 > 1,784 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Chrysler Cirrus is 2 % wider than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,994 cc
The Chrysler Cirrus has 2 cc bigger engine capacity in relation to the BMW. Because the difference is small, the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual should accelerate only a bit dynamically, of course assuming that other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

600 > 405 kg
6

Length

4,741 > 4,612 mm
The Chrysler Cirrus is 3 % longer than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have bigger trunk. While the Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual occurs to be better for families or those who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the BMW may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For those who prefer a comfortable vehicle the four-door Chrysler Cirrus is a way reasonably to own. But for drivers who are looking for more attractive design we recommend to choose the 2-door BMW.

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual Chrysler Cirrus Coupe 2.0 i 16V 132HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,805 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 1995
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK