Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual vs BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer, model available from 2007.
It has 2.0 HDi 163HP diesel engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual
Citroen

20 reasons for Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,860 > 1,784 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual is 76 mm wider in comparison to the BMW 3-Series E90. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

1,392 > 1,340 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 62 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer that can carry 13 percent more fuel than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. The medium fuel container capacity in the mid-size class, which is represented by the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer, amounts to 63 liters, whereas in mid-size segment (represented by the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual) it amounts to 63 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,809 > 2,768 mm
Citroen C5 III has 41 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the BMW. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

1,076 > 1,068 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,651 > 1,575 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,994 cc
The Citroen has 4 cc bigger engine displacement in comparison to the BMW. As the difference is small, the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer should accelerate a bit better, assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

643 > 405 kg
6

Length

4,830 > 4,612 mm
The Citroen is 5 % longer in comparison to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Citroen probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Citroen will be better driven but the BMW will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,560 > 1,513 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and useful car is five-door Citroen C5 III Crosstourer. The two-door version of BMW has less advantages, apart from more aggressive look.
1

Model release date

2007 > 2004
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual may have more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,483 > 1,393 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 6 % to the advantage of the Citroen is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,750 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

2,238 > 1,904 kg
0

Front track

1,586 > 1,500 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,096 > 1,960 mm
0

Rear overhang

962 > 1,051 mm
0

Curb weight

1,595 > 1,495 kg

BMW

11 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184KM manual in comparison to Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 163 hp
The horsepower of the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual is 13 percent bigger than the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual. Because the difference is little this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 5.2 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 burns up 14 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Citroen. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual, which is palced in „large family cars” segment burns up by 3.2 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.7 l.
59

Maximal torque

381 > 340 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW is 12 percent bigger than the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer. As a result, the BMW will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the BMW 3-Series E90 will consume on average less fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 6.8 l
The BMW consumes of 0.7 l diesel fewer running around the town compared to the Citroen C5 III. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, as a representative of middle class, burns up 4.5 l per 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “D” segment equals to 10.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 9.3 s
The Citroen speeds up relatively slower compared with the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. The difference in the amount of 1.8 s is is slightly to the BMW 3-Series E90 advantage, however, it should not be strongly taken by you into as important when selecting the better one of presented cars.
33

Top speed

237 > 210 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​BMW is greater in comparison to of the Citroen C5 III Crosstourer by 13, which allows the BMW to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 27 kilometers per hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is delivered shows us how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with increase in revolutions. The lower revolutions or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 4.5 l
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Front overhang

798 > 1,054 mm
0

Tire profile

45 > 55 %

Cars specifications

Citroen C5 III Crosstourer 2.0 HDi 163HP manual BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,805 kg
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2007 2004
    Facelifting no yes
    Code name - E90-91-92-93
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK