BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual vs Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

19 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe, model available from 1998 to 2006.
It has 2.2 i 16V 141HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual
BMW

19 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184KM manual in comparison to Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 141 hp
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has by 30 percent more horsepower in relation to Pontiac Grand Am V. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual will be distinctly better speed up because of bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also passing cars or obstacles should be much more easier for the BMW 3-Series E90 equipped with more powerful engine.
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 8.4 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 uses 46 % fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual. The difference at the level of 3.9 l will be quite significant in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 9.8 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 burns up of 3.7 l fuel fewer running around the town in relation to the Pontiac Grand Am V. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual, which is classified in middle segment, burns up 4.5 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “middle” class equals to 10.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
33

Top speed

237 > 190 km/h
The top speed of the ​​BMW is greater than this of the Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe by 25, which allows the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 25 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Range

1,340 > 643 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 53 l
In this category it is the BMW 3-Series E90 that can contain 17 % more fuel in relation to the Pontiac. The medium fuel tank capacity in the mid-size segment, from which the BMW comes from, equals 63 l, whereas in middle segment (represented by the Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual) it is 63 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,723 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has 2 percent longer wheelbase distance when compared to Pontiac Grand Am V. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of BMW should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

1,068 > 551 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW 3-Series E90 have a higher speed count than the Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe which means that BMW 3-Series E90 would achieve faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,504 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 1998
Production of the older vehicle started much more earlier than its competitor thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle has not so modern parts .
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,500 > 1,498 mm
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2006
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,495 > 1,400 kg

Pontiac

5 reasons for Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,788 > 1,784 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Pontiac is 4 millimeters wider in relation to the BMW. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

2,190 > 1,994 cc
The Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe has by 10 % bigger engine displacement than the BMW. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,736 > 4,612 mm
The Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual is 124 mm longer in comparison to the BMW. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. While the Pontiac Grand Am V occurs to be better pick for families or those who value comfortable rides, the BMW 3-Series E90 may appeal to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,400 > 1,393 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual, which is by 7 millimeters higher than the BMW, would be appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual Pontiac Grand Am V Coupe 2.2 i 16V 141HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,805 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 1998
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK