BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual vs Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

17 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

15 reasons for

Volkswagen Passat CC, model available from 2008 to 2011.
It has 1.8 TSI 160HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual
BMW

17 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184KM manual in comparison to Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 160 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual that has by 15 percent horsepower more than the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual, which makes this vehicle slightly better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting will also provide a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 7.4 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting's advantage. This vehicle uses 2.9 l fewer oil in the combined cycle when compared with the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the mid-size class, in which the BMW is classified, equals to 7.7 l whereas the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting needs by 42 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

381 > 250 Nm
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual has 52 % more torque than the Volkswagen Passat CC. Although the vast majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a vehicle, it describes the best how a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is relevant thus the BMW will deliver you better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 9.7 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual uses of 3.6 l fuel fewer running around the town in relation to the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, which is classified in mid-size segment, uses 4.5 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “middle” class is 10.6 l/100Km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 8.6 s
A small difference in the amount of 1.1 s indicates that the Volkswagen is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „mid-size segment, being represented by the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 9.9 s and is by 13 percent lower than this of Volkswagen vehicle.
33

Top speed

237 > 222 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​BMW is greater in comparison to the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual by 15 kilometers/hour, which allows the BMW to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 7 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 5.9 l
19

Range

1,340 > 946 km
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,713 mm
BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has 2 percent longer wheelbase when compared to the Volkswagen Passat CC. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

1,068 > 707 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,575 > 1,186 km
8

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,798 cc
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual has 11 percent bigger engine displacement in relation to the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual. As the difference is small, the BMW 3-Series E90 should accelerate slightly better, of course assuming that other paramerters are equal.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,805 > 1,698 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Battery capacity

90 > 60 Ah
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2011

Volkswagen

15 reasons for Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 1,755 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is produced shows us how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

1,855 > 1,784 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Volkswagen Passat CC is 71 mm wider than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

70 > 62 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Volkswagen Passat CC which can carry 13 percent more fuel compared with the BMW. The average fuel tank size in the large family cars segment, which is represented by the Volkswagen Passat CC, equals 63 liters, whereas in middle class (represented by the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual) it is 63 liters.
8

Maximum load capacity

445 > 405 kg
6

Length

4,800 > 4,612 mm
The Volkswagen Passat CC is 188 mm longer in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Volkswagen Passat CC preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Volkswagen Passat CC will be better driven but the BMW 3-Series E90 will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,557 > 1,513 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For people who want to have a car for larger amount of passengers the 4-door Volkswagen Passat CC is a way better to choose. Nevertheless, for those that appreciate sporty styling of the car we suggest choosing the two-door BMW 3-Series E90.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2004
Because of the fact that the BMW debuted only 4 years prior to the Volkswagen, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Volkswagen Passat CC may feature slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,419 > 1,393 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual, which is by 26 millimeters higher than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Payload

1,951 > 1,904 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

747 > 742 kg
0

Front track

1,552 > 1,500 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,094 > 1,960 mm
0

Curb weight

1,510 > 1,495 kg

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320d 184HP manual Volkswagen Passat CC 1.8 TSI 160HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,805 kg 1,698 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2008
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK