BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic vs Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320i 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

14 reasons for

Chevrolet Malibu VI, model available from 2008 to 2012.
It has 2.4 H 166HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual
BMW

15 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170KM automat in comparison to Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 166 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the BMW 3-Series E90 that has by 4 horsepower more than the Chevrolet, which makes this vehicle slightly better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the BMW should as well provide slightly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.8 l
The BMW burns up 1.2 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Chevrolet Malibu VI. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic, being palced in „middle” segment burns up by 1.1 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.7 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.5 > 10.8 l
The BMW uses of 12 percent petrol less in city traffic compared to the Chevrolet. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, which is classified in middle class, burns up of 1.1 l/100Km fewer than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “middle” class is 10.6 l/100Km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.8 > 9.5 s
A small difference at the level of 7 percent shows that the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual is the worst car of these two presented. In the „middle segment, being represented by the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual, the average acceleration is 9.9 s and is by 0.4 s lower than this of Chevrolet car.
33

Top speed

228 > 204 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​BMW 3-Series E90 is greater compared with of the Chevrolet by 24 kilometers per hour, which allows the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic to travel faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 24 kilometers/hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,255 > 4,605 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine achieves its best output with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 6 l
19

Range

926 > 795 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 61 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic which can contain 2 percent more fuel in relation to the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual. The average fuel tank capacity in the mid-size segment, which is represented by the BMW, equals 63 liters, whereas in large family cars segment (represented by the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual) it amounts to 63 l.
12

Urban range

677 > 574 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,189 > 1,033 km
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2012
0

Tire profile

45 > 50 %

Chevrolet

14 reasons for Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

225 > 211 Nm
The Chevrolet Malibu VI has 14 newton meters more torque when compared to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it informs the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
22

Width

1,789 > 1,784 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Chevrolet Malibu VI is 5 mm wider in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,858 > 2,768 mm
The Chevrolet has 3 percent longer wheelbase than BMW. Thanks to this the Chevrolet is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

2,384 > 1,994 cc
The Chevrolet Malibu VI has 20 percent larger engine size in comparison to the BMW 3-Series E90. Because the difference is little, the Chevrolet should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,870 > 4,612 mm
The Chevrolet Malibu VI is 6 percent longer when compared to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Chevrolet occurs to be better pick for families or persons who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic may appeal to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,526 > 1,513 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For drivers that want to have a car for larger amount of passengers the 4-door Chevrolet is a way better to choose. Nevertheless, for people that are looking for sporty styling of the car we recommend to choose the 2-door BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2004
Given that the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic was introduced only 4 years earlier than the Chevrolet Malibu VI, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Chevrolet Malibu VI may feature slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,451 > 1,393 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 58 mm to the advantage of the Chevrolet Malibu VI is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,800 > 6,700 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,517 > 1,500 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Curb weight

1,527 > 1,465 kg

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,605 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2008
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK