BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic vs Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

11 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320i 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

1 reason for

Mazda 626 III Coupe, model available from 1987 to 1996.
It has 2.0 12V 107HP petrol engine produced from 1987 to 1988.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP
BMW

11 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170KM automat in comparison to Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 107 hp
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is equipped with petrol which makes by 59 percent more horsepower than the the engine of the Mazda, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be better choice for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
22

Width

1,784 > 1,690 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is 6 % wider than the Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,505 mm
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has 263 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Mazda. Therefore the BMW is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,612 > 4,455 mm
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic is 4 % longer in comparison to the Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The BMW preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic will be better driven but the Mazda 626 III Coupe will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,468 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 1987
1

Height

1,393 > 1,359 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the BMW 3-Series E90, which is by 3 % higher than the Mazda, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift that is placed in the Mazda 626 III Coupe is more simpler construction and is cheaper in use, however, also it is less comfortable because it requires the driver to operate clutch to shift gears very often, especialy in a congested urban traffic where drivers have lots of stop and go situations. An automatic gearbox in the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic with 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better choice.
0

Front track

1,500 > 1,458 mm
0

End of model sale

2013 > 1996

Mazda

1 reason for Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107KM in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Reasons for
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
An owner of the Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP gets an extra door as a tailgate. It will allow him to place things into a boot in more convenient manner, especialy when it comes to things of large size. Passages of both cars who are to seat in the rear have to get in a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic Mazda 626 III Coupe 2.0 12V 107HP
    Gross trailer weight 1,605 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 1987
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK