The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Suzuki Kizashi that has by 8 horsepower more in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic, which makes this car slightly faster. Having more horsepower the Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual should as well provide a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
Maximum torque of the Suzuki Kizashi is 9 percent bigger than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. Because of this, the Suzuki will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Suzuki Kizashi will consume on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
The Suzuki Kizashi consumes 17 percent fewer petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the BMW. The Suzuki, that represents large family cars segment, burns up 2.7 l fewer petrol. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large family cars class equals to 10.6 l, whereas the Suzuki Kizashi burns up by 25 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference at the level of 1 sek shows that the BMW 3-Series E90 is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „D” segment, to which the BMW is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 11 % slower than acceleration of BMW’s vehicle.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered affects an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always good to check a torque graph.
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Suzuki is 2 % wider in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual that is able to hold by 1 liter more gasoline in relation to the BMW.
The Suzuki is 1 % longer than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Suzuki occurs to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the BMW 3-Series E90 may appeal to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
Maximum load capacity
The Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual has by 400 cc greater engine size than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
Model release date
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual may have more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Suzuki, which is by 87 millimeters higher than the BMW 3-Series E90, is better pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
Number of doors
For drivers that need a comfortable vehicle the four-door Suzuki is a way reasonably to choose. Nevertheless, for people that appreciate more attractive look we suggest choosing the two-door BMW 3-Series E90.