Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual vs BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

Suzuki Kizashi, model available from 2009 to 2013.
It has 2.4 VVT 178HP petrol engine produced from 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320i 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic
Suzuki

21 reasons for Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic

Reasons for
137

Maximal power

178 > 170 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Suzuki Kizashi that has by 8 horsepower more in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic, which makes this car slightly faster. Having more horsepower the Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual should as well provide a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

230 > 211 Nm
Maximum torque of the Suzuki Kizashi is 9 percent bigger than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. Because of this, the Suzuki will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Suzuki Kizashi will consume on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
54

Urban consumption

7.9 > 9.5 l
The Suzuki Kizashi consumes 17 percent fewer petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the BMW. The Suzuki, that represents large family cars segment, burns up 2.7 l fewer petrol. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large family cars class equals to 10.6 l, whereas the Suzuki Kizashi burns up by 25 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.8 > 8.8 s
A little difference at the level of 1 sek shows that the BMW 3-Series E90 is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „D” segment, to which the BMW is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 9.9 s and is by 11 % slower than acceleration of BMW’s vehicle.
29

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,255 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered affects an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always good to check a torque graph.
20

Width

1,818 > 1,784 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Suzuki is 2 % wider in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
20

Fuel tank

63 > 62 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual that is able to hold by 1 liter more gasoline in relation to the BMW.
13

Urban range

797 > 677 km
9

Length

4,650 > 4,612 mm
The Suzuki is 1 % longer than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Suzuki occurs to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the BMW 3-Series E90 may appeal to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
7

Maximum load capacity

580 > 375 kg
4

Engine capacity

2,394 > 1,994 cc
The Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual has by 400 cc greater engine size than the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
3

Rear track

1,567 > 1,513 mm
2

Model release date

2009 > 2004
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual may have more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
2

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
2

Height

1,480 > 1,393 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Suzuki, which is by 87 millimeters higher than the BMW 3-Series E90, is better pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Number of doors

4 > 2
For drivers that need a comfortable vehicle the four-door Suzuki is a way reasonably to choose. Nevertheless, for people that appreciate more attractive look we suggest choosing the two-door BMW 3-Series E90.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,500 > 6,700 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

2,003 > 1,844 kg
0

Front track

1,568 > 1,500 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″

BMW

9 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170KM automat in comparison to Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

6.6 > 8 l
The BMW consumes 1.4 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Suzuki Kizashi. The BMW, which is palced in „large family cars” segment consumes by 1.1 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.7 l.
28

Top speed

228 > 215 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is higher as compared to this of the Suzuki Kizashi which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 6 % is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 6.2 l
16

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,701 mm
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has 67 millimeters longer wheelbase than Suzuki. Therefore the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
16

Range

926 > 797 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,189 > 1,000 km
2

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth ride in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic but the type of transmisison can have a big effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Curb weight

1,465 > 1,423 kg

Cars specifications

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 VVT 178HP manual BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 320i 170HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight - 1,605 kg
    Model release date 2009 2004
    Price range popular luxury
    Facelifting no yes
    Code name - E90-91-92-93
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK