BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 vs Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

26 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 330d 245HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Chevrolet Alero, model available from 1998 to 2004.
It has 2.4 i 142HP ic petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic
BMW

26 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

245 > 142 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the BMW 3-Series E90 which has by 73 % more horsepower when compared to the Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic. Consequently the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 can reach higher velocity. Thanks to more horsepower the BMW 3-Series E90 will also provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 9.4 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW 3-Series E90's advantage. This vehicle burns 3.1 l less diesel in the combined cycle than the Chevrolet Alero. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the mid-size class, in which the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting is classified, is 7.7 l while the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting uses by 18 % less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

521 > 199 Nm
When you push the gas and you start accelerating quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better driving the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 because it has by 322 Nm more torque in relation to the Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pressed back in the seat as the car accelerate.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 13.4 l
The BMW burns up 4.9 l less oil while driving inside city when compared to the Chevrolet. The difference at the level of 37 % is quite noticeable in everyday use of the vehicle. However, in a long run it will give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may change depending on your driving style
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.8 > 10.6 s
If a fast driving is what you realy like, the BMW 3-Series E90 will appeal to you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 4.8 s better in relation to the Chevrolet Alero.
33

Top speed

250 > 200 km/h
The BMW has by 25 % grater top velocity when compared to the Chevrolet Alero, thanks to which a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be traveled much more faster. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 4,205 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both compared cars are equipped with different engines. The BMW has the diesel engine, the Chevrolet Alero has the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.4 > 7.1 l
22

Width

1,784 > 1,775 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 is 9 mm wider in comparison to the Chevrolet Alero. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

969 > 606 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 56 l
The Chevrolet Alero gives way to the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The BMW is able to hold by 6 liters more fuel in comparison to the Chevrolet Alero.
15

Wheelbase

2,768 > 2,728 mm
BMW 3-Series E90 has 1 % longer wheelbase than the Chevrolet. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

759 > 425 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,145 > 803 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 4 gears
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting has only one more speed compared to the Chevrolet Alero. Sometimes the extra speed is used as an overdrive so that the previous speeds can be shorter to allow increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed also helps to decrease fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

2,992 > 2,392 cc
The BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 has 600 cubic centimeters larger engine displacement in relation to the Chevrolet Alero. The difference is considerable. As a result the BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement usually affects worst fuel efficiency.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 1998
Manufacture of the older car started 6 years prior to its competitor thus we may expect that this vehicle has not so advanced solutions used.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2004
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,700 > 1,478 kg

Chevrolet

5 reasons for Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142KM automat in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
6

Length

4,740 > 4,612 mm
The Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic is 3 percent longer in relation to the BMW. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Chevrolet Alero very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Chevrolet Alero will be better driven but the BMW will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For people that are looking for a vehicle for more than two persons the 4-door Chevrolet Alero is much appropriate to opt for. However, for those who appreciate more attractive styling of the car we recommend to choose the 2-door BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4.
1

Height

1,400 > 1,393 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 7 mm to the advantage of the Chevrolet Alero is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To those who value less absorbing driving a car and who don’t need complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. For those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Coupe E92 Facelifting 330d 245HP manual 4x4 Chevrolet Alero 2.4 i 142HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 1,805 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 1998
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK