BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual vs Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual

BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90, model available from 2004 to 2013.
It has 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP diesel engine produced from 2011 to 2011.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Chevrolet Malibu VI, model available from 2008 to 2012.
It has 2.4 H 166HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual
BMW

15 reasons for BMW Seria 3 E90 Limuzyna E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163KM manual in comparison to Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 7.8 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 uses 2.5 l less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Chevrolet Malibu VI. The difference at the level of 2.5 l will be quite perceptible in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will result in a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

341 > 225 Nm
The BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual has 52 percent more torque when compared to the Chevrolet Malibu VI. Although the vast majority of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is of considerable size and for that reason the BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 will provide you with better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

7.7 > 10.8 l
The BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual burns up 29 percent of fuel fewer in the city in relation to the Chevrolet. The BMW 3-Series E90, which represents mid-size class, burns up 2.9 l fewer diesel, which is by 27 % better result than the average in the same segment. The difference in this category between these two cars is quite significant, so remember that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should pick up vehicles of similar characteristics.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.3 > 9.5 s
A small difference that amounts to 13 percent shows that the Chevrolet Malibu VI is the worst car of these two . In the „mid-size segment, being represented by the Chevrolet Malibu VI, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 9.9 s and is by 0.4 s lower than this of Chevrolet vehicle.
33

Top speed

225 > 204 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​BMW is greater than this of the Chevrolet Malibu VI by 21 kilometers per hour, which allows the BMW to travel quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,605 revolutions/minute
Such a huge difference stems from the fact that both cars are equipped with different engines. The BMW 3-Series E90 has the diesel engine, the Chevrolet is equipped with the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different types of engines, comparing this feature has no sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.4 > 6 l
22

Width

1,819 > 1,789 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The BMW 3-Series E90 is 30 mm wider than the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

62 > 61 l
The Chevrolet Malibu VI gives way to the BMW in the field of fuel tank capacity. The BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual is able to carry by 2 % more fuel in comparison to the Chevrolet Malibu VI.
19

Range

1,145 > 795 km
12

Urban range

840 > 574 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,400 > 1,033 km
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2013 > 2012

Chevrolet

12 reasons for Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

166 > 163 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Chevrolet which has by 2 percent horsepower more than the BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual, which makes this vehicle slightly faster. Due to more horsepower the Chevrolet will as well give a bit more efficiency in specific gears.
15

Wheelbase

2,858 > 2,768 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Chevrolet Malibu VI has 3 % longer wheelbase distance than BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Chevrolet Malibu VI should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,384 > 1,994 cc
The Chevrolet Malibu VI has 20 percent bigger cubic capacity in relation to the BMW 3-Series E90. As the difference is not big, the Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual should accelerate a bit dynamically, of course if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,870 > 4,520 mm
The Chevrolet Malibu VI is 8 % longer in comparison to the BMW. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Chevrolet will be better driven ,however, the BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,526 > 1,513 mm
1

Model release date

2008 > 2004
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Chevrolet Malibu VI may feature more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,451 > 1,419 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Chevrolet Malibu VI, which is by 2 percent higher than the BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Front track

1,517 > 1,500 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 55 %
0

Curb weight

1,527 > 1,405 kg

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series E90 Limousine E90 320d EfficientDynamics 163HP manual Chevrolet Malibu VI 2.4 H 166HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E90-91-92-93 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK