BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual vs Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31, model available from 2012.
It has 320i 184HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Kia Clarus II Estate, model available from 1998 to 2001.
It has 1.8 i 16V 116HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2001.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual
BMW

21 reasons for BMW Seria 3 F30 Touring F31 320i 184KM manual in comparison to Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 116 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the BMW which has by 59 % more horsepower than the Kia. Consequently the BMW is able to reach higher top speed. With more horsepower the BMW should also give noticeably better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 9.5 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual's advantage. This car consumes 35 % less petrol in the combined cycle in comparison to the Kia. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the D class, in which the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 is classified, is 7.7 l whereas the BMW 3-Series F30 needs by 20 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

271 > 153 Nm
Because of 118 newton meters greater torque, the engine of the BMW does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Kia. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

8.9 > 12.1 l
The BMW 3-Series F30 consumes 3.2 l less fuel in city traffic compared with the Kia. The difference at the level of 3.2 l is very big in daily use of car. Additionally, within many months it may bring gigantic cost savings. Also keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 10.7 s
If a swift driving is what you are really in to, the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 30 % faster than the Kia Clarus II.
33

Top speed

233 > 185 km/h
The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual has by 48 kilometers per hour grater top velocity in relation to the Kia, consequently a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,255 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that the winner is is this of the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual. The engine of the Kia reaches its full efficiency at 4,495 revolutions per minute which is by 3,240 revolutions per minute lower compared with the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 7.8 l
22

Width

1,810 > 1,782 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The BMW is 28 millimeters wider in relation to the Kia. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,807 > 2,659 mm
The BMW 3-Series F30 has 6 % longer wheelbase in relation to Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual. As a result the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,792 cc
The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 has 204 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Kia Clarus II. For the reason that the difference is small, the BMW should accelerate slightly better, of course assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,500 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 1998
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,025 > 1,844 kg
0

Front track

1,528 > 1,503 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,545 > 1,280 kg

Kia

2 reasons for Kia Clarus II Kombi 1.8 i 16V 116KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual

Reasons for
8

Maximum load capacity

565 > 475 kg
6

Length

4,750 > 4,630 mm
The Kia Clarus II Estate is 3 percent longer in relation to the BMW. The length of the car is important when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Kia Clarus II preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual will be better driven but the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Code name F30-F31-F34 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK