BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31, model available from 2012.
It has 320i 184HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Mitsubishi Space Star, model available from 2014.
It has 1.0 71HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual
BMW

16 reasons for BMW Seria 3 F30 Touring F31 320i 184KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 71 hp
The Mitsubishi Space Star significantly loses with the BMW 3-Series F30 in the category of amount of horses under the hood having them by 159 % less. As a result the engine installed in the BMW 3-Series F30 ,unlike the Mitsubishi Space Star, has lots of power and impersive acceleration.
59

Maximal torque

271 > 86 Nm
The difference of 185 newton meters is really substantial as a result of which the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual features much more better flexibility of the engine, it speeds up significantly faster and has better towing capacity.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 13.6 s
The BMW speeds up to 100k\h by 6.1 s faster than the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

233 > 172 km/h
The BMW 3-Series F30 has by 35 % higher maximum speed in relation to the Mitsubishi, as a result of which a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be traveled much more faster. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,255 > 4,995 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31. The engine of the Mitsubishi Space Star achieves its full efficiency at 4,995 revolutions/minute which is by 75 percent worst result compared with the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31.
22

Width

1,810 > 1,669 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The BMW 3-Series F30 is 141 millimeters wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,807 > 2,441 mm
The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual has 15 % longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to this the BMW 3-Series F30 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 998 cc
The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 has 100 % bigger engine displacement when compared to the Mitsubishi Space Star. The difference is relatively notable. As a result the BMW should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger cubic capacity usually results in worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

475 > 445 kg
6

Length

4,630 > 3,750 mm
The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 is 880 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 will be better driven but the Mitsubishi will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,418 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,025 > 1,286 kg
0

Front track

1,528 > 1,430 mm
0

Curb weight

1,545 > 849 kg

Mitsubishi

6 reasons for Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71KM manual in comparison to BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.2 > 6.2 l
The Mitsubishi uses 32 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual. The difference in the amount of 32 percent will be very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

4.6 > 8.9 l
The fuel economy in the city is distinctly to the Mitsubishi Space Star's advantage. This car consumes 48 % less fuel while driving inside city when compared to the BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31. Better fuel consumption means less fuel cost passed on you.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.6 > 5 l
1

Model release date

2014 > 2012
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Mitsubishi Space Star may feature more advanced technologies.
0

Front overhang

728 > 775 mm
0

Rear overhang

528 > 1,037 mm

Cars specifications

BMW 3-Series F30 Touring F31 320i 184HP manual Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 71HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Code name F30-F31-F34 -
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK