The fuel economy is distinctly to Nissan's advantage. This vehicle uses 20 % fewer gasoline in the combined cycle when compared with the BMW. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the E class, in which the Nissan Maxima III 3.0 i 170HP manual is classified, is 8.8 l whereas the Nissan Maxima III 3.0 i 170HP manual needs by 11 percent more amount of fuel than the average.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Nissan Maxima III is 9 mm wider than the BMW 5-Series E34. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
Maximum load capacity
The Nissan Maxima III is 60 millimeters longer in relation to the BMW 5-Series E34 M5 Sedan. The length of the car is significant in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Nissan Maxima III 3.0 i 170HP manual will be better driven but the BMW 5-Series E34 will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
An engine in the shape of a V is a
improved construction of a
which according to us is
adventages. Engine of V layout
inside a car the Nissan Maxima III
gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
engime may contain more
cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A
Better engine work and pleasant sound is
to driving fans to a V engine’s advantage.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Nissan Maxima III, which is by 2 percent higher than the BMW 5-Series E34, is better option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.