BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual vs Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual

BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11, model available from 2010.
It has 520d 184HP diesel engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mazda 6 III Estate, model available from 2012.
It has 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual
BMW

16 reasons for BMW Seria 5 F10 Touring F11 520d 184KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 175 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the BMW 5-Series F10 which has by 5 percent horsepower more in relation to the Mazda 6 III, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Having more horsepower the BMW 5-Series F10 will also give somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

560 > 506 l
If you are looking for a vehicles by which you could set of for travels, which could hold more luggage , choose the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11. The Mazda is equiped with by 54 l less capable trunk in relation to the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual so probably you would be able to take with you one small parcel less. When it comes to the luggage compartment pay attention to its dimensions which have considerable effect on loading capability .
33

Top speed

222 > 221 km/h
The top speed of the ​​BMW 5-Series F10 is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda by 1 kilometer/hour, which allows the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 1 km/h is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,905 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always recommended to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,860 > 1,845 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The BMW is 15 mm wider than the Mazda. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,373 > 1,348 km
19

Fuel tank

69 > 62 l
The Mazda gives way to the BMW 5-Series F10 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The BMW 5-Series F10 is able to hold by 11 % more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,975 > 2,752 mm
The BMW 5-Series F10 has 223 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Mazda 6 III Estate. Consequently the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

1,129 > 1,088 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,556 > 1,550 km
6

Length

4,907 > 4,806 mm
The BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual is 101 mm longer than the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 6 III Estate may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,487 > 1,475 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual, which is by 1 percent higher than the Mazda, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,360 > 2,090 kg
0

Front overhang

833 > 955 mm

Mazda

8 reasons for Mazda 6 III Kombi 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175KM manual in comparison to BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.4 > 4.9 l
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual uses 10 % less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual. The Mazda 6 III, being classified in „large family cars” segment uses by 3.3 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.7 l.
59

Maximal torque

419 > 381 Nm
The Mazda 6 III Estate has 10 % more torque than the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11. Even though a large number of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a car, it shows the best how fast a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is little so you probably will not feel the difference.
56

Urban consumption

5.5 > 6.4 l
The Mazda consumes 14 % fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the BMW. The difference at the level of 0.9 l is not perceptible in daily usage of the automobile but within a few years it would give a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8 > 8.3 s
A little difference at the level of 4 percent indicates that the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „E class, being represented by the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 9.7 s and is by 1.4 s lower than this of BMW vehicle.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.4 l
8

Engine capacity

2,191 > 1,994 cc
The Mazda 6 III Estate has 10 % larger cubic capacity in comparison to the BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11. For the reason that the difference is little, the Mazda should accelerate only a bit better, if other paramerters are equal.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mazda may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Rear overhang

1,101 > 1,107 mm

Cars specifications

BMW 5-Series F10 Touring F11 520d 184HP manual Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,005 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2010 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Code name F10-F11 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK