BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

8 reasons for

BMW X1 Crossover, model available from 2009.
It has sDrive18i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
BMW

8 reasons for BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150KM manual in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 125 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the BMW X1 which has by 25 horsepower more in relation to the Ford, which makes this car slightly quicker. Having more horsepower the BMW X1 should also give slightly better efficiency in specific gears.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 12.7 s
A small difference amounts to 3 seconds shows that the Ford Ecosport II is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the Ford Ecosport II is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 1.8 s faster than acceleration of Ford’s car.
33

Top speed

202 > 180 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the BMW X1 is greater as compared to this of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 12 percent is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,521 mm
The BMW has 239 millimeters longer wheelbase than Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Consequently the BMW X1 is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,000 cc
The BMW X1 has 994 cc greater engine size when compared to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. The difference is relatively considerable. Consequently the BMW X1 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement usually equals worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,454 > 4,244 mm
The BMW X1 Crossover is 210 mm longer in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The BMW X1 very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Ford will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
3

Price range

luxury > popular

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 7.5 l
The Ford uses 29 percent less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the BMW X1 Crossover. The difference at the level of 2.2 l will be very appreciable in everyday usage of the car. In the long period of time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 10.6 l
The Ford uses 36 percent less fuel in the city in relation to the BMW. The difference at the level of 36 % is quite noticeable in everyday use of the car. But, in a long term it will bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on your driving style
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6.1 l
22

Width

2,057 > 1,796 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Ecosport II is 261 millimeters wider when compared to the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2009
The difference in release date between presented vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Ford may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,696 > 1,545 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 10 percent to the advantage of the Ford Ecosport II is small and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2009 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,990 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK