Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

18 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

BMW X1 Crossover, model available from 2009.
It has sDrive18i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual
Ford

18 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.5 l
The Ford Kuga II consumes 0.9 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the BMW X1. The Ford Kuga II, which is classified in „mini 4x4” class consumes by 0.9 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 201 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Kuga II is 39 newton meters higher than the BMW. Because of this, the Ford Kuga II will accelerate a little bit better and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Ford Kuga II will consume fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 10.6 l
The Ford Kuga II burns up of 20 % fuel fewer in the city in relation to the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual. The Ford, which is classified in small off-road 4x4 segment, uses of 1.1 l per 100 km fewer than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” class is 9.6 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 420 l
The trunk of the Ford Kuga II is only 9 % bigger than the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot size.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,349 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 3,605 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Ford Kuga II. The engine of the BMW X1 achieves its full efficiency at 3,605 revolutions per minute which is by 56 percent worst result compared with the Ford Kuga II.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 6.1 l
22

Width

1,838 > 1,796 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Ford is widther by 42 millimeters in comparison to the BMW X1 Crossover and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” class amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 41 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 485 kg
6

Length

4,524 > 4,454 mm
The Ford Kuga II is 70 mm longer in comparison to the BMW X1 Crossover. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Ford Kuga II seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the BMW X1 Crossover may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,529 mm
1

Model release date

2012 > 2009
Because of the fact that the BMW X1 Crossover started to be manufactured only 3 years earlier than the Ford Kuga II, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Ford Kuga II may have slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,745 > 1,545 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 13 % to the advantage of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is insignificant and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,100 > 1,990 kg
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,498 mm
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,504 kg

BMW

5 reasons for BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150KM manual in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
33

Top speed

202 > 195 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the BMW X1 Crossover is higher in comparison to this of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 4 percent is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,693 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual has 67 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of BMW X1 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,597 cc
The BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual has by 397 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity when compared to the Ford Kuga II. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Tire profile

50 > 55 %

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg -
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2012 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK