BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual vs Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

BMW X1 Crossover, model available from 2009.
It has sDrive18i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

12 reasons for

Honda CR-V IV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
BMW

13 reasons for BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.5 > 7.8 l
The BMW X1 Crossover consumes 0.3 l less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not perceptible. At the same time in the long run it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

201 > 192 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual is 9 Nm bigger than the Honda CR-V IV. For this reason, the BMW X1 will accelerate a little bit faster and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the BMW will consume on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 10.2 s
The BMW can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 9.7 s, which is 0.5 s less in comparison to the Honda. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a ride.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,349 > 1,145 l
33

Top speed

202 > 190 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual is higher as compared to this of the Honda CR-V IV which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 6 % is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,605 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached tells us how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.1 > 6.4 l
19

Range

818 > 763 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 59 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual which is able to take by 5 percent more fuel than the Honda CR-V IV.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,624 mm
BMW X1 has 5 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Honda CR-V IV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
11

Extra-urban range

1,016 > 892 km
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

6,400 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Honda

12 reasons for Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Honda CR-V IV is 5 horsepowers bigger than the BMW X1. As the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
56

Urban consumption

9.4 > 10.6 l
The fuel consumption of the Honda CR-V IV is 1.2 l better in relation to the BMW. Despite the difference is small, in the long term it can make that the vehicle would be considerably less expensive to exploate.
38

Trunk capacity

590 > 420 l
The Honda CR-V IV has 170 liters bigger boot in comparison to the BMW. Such a difference is quite relevant and it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Honda has 33 % bigger trunk size than the average in its segment. Larger trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as while everyday car’s usage.
22

Width

1,820 > 1,796 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 is 1 percent wider when compared to the BMW X1 Crossover. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
12

Urban range

617 > 606 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,994 cc
The Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 has 4 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity in comparison to the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual. As the difference is little, the Honda CR-V IV should accelerate slightly dynamically, of course if other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

558 > 485 kg
6

Length

4,570 > 4,454 mm
The Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 is 116 mm longer in comparison to the BMW X1 Crossover. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Honda preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Honda CR-V IV will be better driven ,however, the BMW X1 Crossover will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
1

Model release date

2012 > 2009
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Honda CR-V IV may feature more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Payload

2,079 > 1,990 kg
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,095 > 2,049 mm
0

Curb weight

1,518 > 1,504 kg

Cars specifications

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 1,700 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2009 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK