BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

BMW X1 Crossover, model available from 2009.
It has sDrive18i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2012.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

15 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
BMW

16 reasons for BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

150 > 115 hp
The BMW X1 is equipped with petrol which delivers by 35 more horsepower than the the engine of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be better option for drivers who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

201 > 190 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual is 6 % greater than the Nissan Qashqai II. As a result, the BMW X1 Crossover will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the BMW X1 will burn up on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 11.3 s
A little difference that amounts to 14 % suggests that the Nissan is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV segment, being represented by the Nissan Qashqai II, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.4 s higher than this of Nissan car.
28

Top speed

202 > 183 km/h
The top velocity of the BMW X1 Crossover is greater as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 19 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
20

Fuel tank

62 > 54 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is BMW X1 Crossover which can hold by 15 % more fuel in relation to the Nissan.
16

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,644 mm
The BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual has 116 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. As a result the BMW is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
9

Length

4,454 > 4,380 mm
The BMW is 74 mm longer in relation to the Nissan. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The BMW preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the BMW will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Engine capacity

1,994 > 1,198 cc
The BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual has 796 cc larger engine capacity than the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the BMW should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement results in worst fuel economy.
2

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
2

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Rim width

7 > 6 mm
0

Payload

1,990 > 1,860 kg
0

Rim diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,504 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

15 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.5 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual's advantage. This automobile uses 1.9 l less gasoline in the combined cycle compared to the BMW X1. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact SUV class, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
54

Urban consumption

6.9 > 10.6 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 3.7 l of petrol less in city traffic compared to the BMW X1. The Nissan, which comes from small off-road 4x4 class, burns up 2.7 l fewer fuel, which constitutes by 28 % lower result in comparison to the average in its class. The difference in this category between compared vehicles is quite significant, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should pick up models with similar parameters.
36

Trunk capacity

438 > 420 l
The boot of the Nissan Qashqai II is only 4 percent bigger than the BMW X1 Crossover. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same boot space.
29

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 3,605 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is produced tells us how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with increase in revolutions. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6.1 l
20

Width

1,800 > 1,796 mm
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Nissan Qashqai II is larger only by 4 mm than the BMW and is not really important. The average for the „mini 4x4” class amounts to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 millimeters smaller than the width of the Nissan Qashqai II.
16

Range

982 > 818 km
12

Urban range

797 > 606 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 1,016 km
7

Maximum load capacity

542 > 485 kg
3

Rear track

1,563 > 1,529 mm
2

Model release date

2014 > 2009
Because of the fact that the BMW X1 was launched only 5 years prior to the Nissan Qashqai II, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Nissan Qashqai II may feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
2

Height

1,590 > 1,545 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 45 millimeters to the advantage of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,498 mm

Cars specifications

BMW X1 Crossover sDrive18i 150HP manual Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,199 kg
    Model release date 2009 2014
    Price range luxury popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK