BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4 vs Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

BMW X3 E83, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 2.0 i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Honda CR-V III SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4
BMW

15 reasons for BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

201 > 190 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW X3 E83 is 6 % bigger than the Honda. Because of this, the BMW will accelerate a little bit faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the BMW will use fever fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

479 > 424 l
The boot of the BMW X3 E83 is only 13 percent bigger than the Honda CR-V III. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same boot capacity.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,561 > 953 l
33

Top speed

198 > 190 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4 which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 8 kilometers per hour is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,755 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt faster.
22

Width

1,851 > 1,822 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4 is 29 mm wider in comparison to the Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

720 > 716 km
19

Fuel tank

66 > 59 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is BMW which can hold by 7 liters more petrol compared with the Honda CR-V III.
15

Wheelbase

2,785 > 2,615 mm
BMW X3 E83 has 7 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Honda. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW have a higher speed count than the Honda CR-V III SUV which means that BMW X3 E83 would achieve faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
8

Maximum load capacity

570 > 481 kg
6

Length

4,569 > 4,530 mm
The BMW X3 E83 is 39 millimeters longer in relation to the Honda. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The BMW X3 E83 probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the BMW X3 E83 will be better driven but the Honda CR-V III will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Payload

2,197 > 2,055 kg
0

Curb weight

1,633 > 1,571 kg

Honda

9 reasons for Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 9.1 l
The Honda CR-V III uses 0.8 l less in the mixed cycle when compared to the BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless in the long term it would give a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

10.4 > 13.3 l
The Honda CR-V III SUV consumes 22 percent of fuel less while driving inside city in relation to the BMW X3 E83. The Honda CR-V III, which represents small off-road 4x4 class, consumes 0.8 l more fuel, which is by 9 percent more fuel consumption in comparison to the average in its segment. The difference in fuel consumption between these two cars is quite significant, so note that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should check vehicles of similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 11.5 s
A small difference at the level of 11 % shows that the BMW X3 E83 is the worst car of these two presented. In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the BMW, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.6 s higher than this of BMW vehicle.
12

Urban range

558 > 511 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,994 cc
The Honda CR-V III has 4 cc greater engine displacement in comparison to the BMW X3 E83. For the reason that the difference is small, the Honda CR-V III SUV should accelerate slightly faster, of course if other paramerters are does not play a role.
1

Model release date

2006 > 2003
The difference in debut day between these two cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Honda CR-V III SUV may have more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,682 > 1,674 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Honda CR-V III, which is by 8 millimeters higher than the BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″

Cars specifications

BMW X3 E83 2.0 i 150HP manual 4x4 Honda CR-V III SUV 2.0 i-VTEC 150HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2003 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E83 -
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK