BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 vs BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

26 reasons for

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has xDrive30d 245HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

BMW X3 E83, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 3.0 d 204HP diesel engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4
BMW

26 reasons for BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

245 > 204 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the BMW X5 E70 which has by 41 horsepower more when compared to the BMW X3 E83, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Having more horsepower the BMW X5 E70 should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 8.2 l
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 uses 12 percent fewer in the combined cycle in comparison to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 12 percent is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless within some time it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

541 > 411 Nm
The BMW X5 E70 has 32 percent more torque when compared to the BMW X3 E83. The difference at such level is relevant, so that the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

8.9 > 11.3 l
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting consumes 2.4 l fewer fuel in city traffic in relation to the BMW. The difference at the level of 2.4 l will be very significant in everyday use of car. Additionally, within long period of time it may give real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably raised if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 7.9 s
The BMW X3 E83 accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower compared to the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting. The difference at the level of 0.3 s is quite low and for that reason it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for buying one of presented cars.
38

Trunk capacity

650 > 479 l
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 features 171 l more capable trunk in relation to the BMW. Such a difference is relevant and it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting has 105 liters bigger boot size than the average in its segment. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,872 > 1,561 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.6 > 6.8 l
22

Width

1,933 > 1,851 mm
Width of a car affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is widther by 82 millimeters in relation to the BMW X3 E83 and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „full-size SUV” segment is 1,866 millimeters and is by 67 mm larger than the same attribute of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting.
19

Range

1,149 > 798 km
19

Fuel tank

84 > 66 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 that can contain 27 % more fuel in relation to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The medium fuel tank capacity in the large off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4, amounts to 84 l, whereas in mini 4x4 class (represented by the BMW X3 E83) it amounts to 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,785 mm
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting has 5 % longer wheelbase than BMW X3 E83. Consequently the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

977 > 604 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,269 > 971 km
8

Maximum load capacity

605 > 425 kg
6

Length

4,852 > 4,569 mm
The BMW X5 E70 is 283 millimeters longer when compared to the BMW X3 E83. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the BMW will be better driven ,however, the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,650 > 1,540 mm
1

Model release date

2006 > 2003
The difference in release date between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting may have more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,776 > 1,674 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 6 % to the advantage of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting is not big and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

255 > 235 mm
0

Payload

2,756 > 2,347 kg
0

Rim diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Front track

1,642 > 1,540 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,201 > 1,988 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Curb weight

2,152 > 1,928 kg

BMW

1 reason for BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,505 > 1,755 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with growth in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 3,496 kg -
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2006 2003
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E70 E83
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK