BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4

BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

BMW X3 E83, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 3.0 d 204HP diesel engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Citroen C-Crosser, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 2.2 HDI 160HP diesel engine produced from 2007 to 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4
BMW

16 reasons for BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

204 > 160 hp
The BMW X3 E83 is equipped with diesel which delivers by 28 percent more horsepower over the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be googd option to those who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

411 > 380 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 is 8 % bigger than the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4. As a result, the BMW X3 E83 will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the BMW will consume fever fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.9 > 9.9 s
The Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in relation to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 20 percent is quite little and it should not be substantially taken by you into as important for choosing one of presented cars.
33

Top speed

210 > 200 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the BMW is higher in comparison to this of the Citroen which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 10 kilometers per hour is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,505 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is worth to analyze a torque graph.
22

Width

1,851 > 1,806 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The width of the BMW X3 E83 is larger by 2 % in comparison to the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 54 mm smaller than the width of the BMW X3 E83.
15

Wheelbase

2,785 > 2,676 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 has 4 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Citroen C-Crosser. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of BMW X3 E83 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,992 > 2,180 cc
The BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 has 812 cc bigger engine displacement than the Citroen. The difference is relatively large. For this reason the BMW X3 E83 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity means worst fuel efficiency.
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,537 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,928 > 1,745 kg

Citroen

10 reasons for Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.3 > 8.2 l
The Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 uses 11 % fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.9 l is not significant. At the same time in the long run it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 11.3 l
The Citroen C-Crosser uses of 14 % oil less in the city in comparison to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The Citroen C-Crosser, as a representative of mini 4x4 segment, consumes 0.1 l per 100 km more than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” class equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.1 > 6.8 l
8

Maximum load capacity

660 > 425 kg
6

Length

4,646 > 4,569 mm
The Citroen C-Crosser is 77 millimeters longer in comparison to the BMW. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Citroen C-Crosser will be better driven ,however, the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
1

Model release date

2007 > 2003
Because of the fact that the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 was launched only 4 years prior to the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4 might feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,713 > 1,674 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Citroen C-Crosser, which is by 39 mm higher than the BMW X3 E83, is better option for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Payload

2,412 > 2,347 kg
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2010
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,070 > 1,988 mm

Cars specifications

BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 Citroen C-Crosser 2.2 HDI 160HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2003 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E83 -
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK