Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual vs BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Ssangyong Kyron I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.0 Xdi 141HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

BMW X3 E83, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 3.0 d 204HP diesel engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4
Ssangyong

14 reasons for Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141KM manual in comparison to BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.9 > 8.2 l
The Ssangyong Kyron I burns up 4 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the BMW. The Ssangyong, being palced in „small off-road 4x4” class burns up by 0.4 l more amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.9 > 11.3 l
The Ssangyong Kyron I burns up 12 % less petrol while driving inside city compared to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4. The Ssangyong Kyron I, that comes from compact SUV segment, consumes 0.3 l less diesel. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mini 4x4 class equals to 9.6 l, while the Ssangyong Kyron I burns up by 4 % more fuel than the average.
22

Width

1,887 > 1,851 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual is larger by 2 % in relation to the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 and is not really worth considering. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to around 1,797 mm and is by 5 % smaller than the same attribute of the Ssangyong Kyron I.
19

Range

974 > 798 km
19

Fuel tank

75 > 66 l
The BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 loses with the Ssangyong Kyron I in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Ssangyong Kyron I is able to hold by 9 l more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
12

Urban range

758 > 604 km
8

Maximum load capacity

601 > 425 kg
6

Length

4,671 > 4,569 mm
The Ssangyong is 102 mm longer in relation to the BMW X3 E83. The length of the car is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Ssangyong Kyron I very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Ssangyong will be better driven ,however, the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,540 mm
1

Model release date

2005 > 2003
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Ssangyong Kyron I may feature more advanced technologies.
1

Height

1,760 > 1,674 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Ssangyong, which is by 5 percent higher than the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4, is better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Payload

2,534 > 2,347 kg
0

Front track

1,570 > 1,540 mm
0

Curb weight

1,932 > 1,928 kg

BMW

10 reasons for BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

204 > 141 hp
The BMW X3 E83 has 45 % more horsepower in comparison to Ssangyong. The BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 will be distinctly faster accelerate because of grater power. Also getting ahead of other vehicles while moving along the road should be much more easier for the BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 equipped with more powerful engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.9 > 14.2 s
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the BMW is better for you because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 44 % faster in relation to the Ssangyong.
33

Top speed

210 > 167 km/h
The Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual has 43 km/h lower maximum velocity than the BMW X3 E83, consequently covering a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference might be perceptible during travelling on highways to the car of BMW brand advantage.
15

Wheelbase

2,785 > 2,740 mm
The BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4 has 45 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Ssangyong Kyron I. Therefore the BMW X3 E83 is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW have a higher gear count compared to the Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual which means that BMW X3 E83 would have faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

2,992 > 1,997 cc
The BMW X3 E83 has 995 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement in relation to the Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual. The difference is big. For this reason the BMW should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement affects worst fuel consumption.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

End of model sale

2010 > 2007
0

Valves

24 > 16

Cars specifications

Ssangyong Kyron I 2.0 Xdi 141HP manual BMW X3 E83 3.0 d 204HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2005 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - E83
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK