The BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic is equipped with petrol which delivers by 60 % more horsepower over the the engine of the Nissan Qashqai II, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be googd car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
Due to 81 newton meters more torque, the engine of the BMW X3 F25 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Nissan. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the BMW X3 F25 fits you better as it’s
acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is
the Nissan Qashqai II.
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the BMW X3 F25 is higher as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 27 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s performance. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is good to check a torque graph.
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The BMW X3 F25 is widther by 5 % in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” class equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 5 percent smaller than the same feature of the BMW X3 F25.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the BMW X3 F25 that can contain 22 % more fuel compared with the Nissan Qashqai II. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic comes from, is 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Nissan) it amounts to 61 liters.
The wheelbase of a car means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. BMW X3 F25 has 165 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Nissan. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of BMW X3 F25 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
Number of gears
The BMW X3 F25 have a higher gear count compared to the Nissan Qashqai II which means
that BMW X3 F25 should achieve
faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet
little and if you are not drag
racing at a timed event you would not even
observe the difference.
The engine capacity of the BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic is by 67 percent larger when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the BMW X3 F25 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
The BMW X3 F25 is 6 percent longer than the Nissan. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The BMW X3 F25 very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the BMW X3 F25 will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the BMW X3 F25, which is by 5 % higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
A stick shift with which the Nissan is equipped is more simpler construction and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable because it requires the driver to put on clutch to shift gears very often, especialy in a congested city traffic where we have lots of frequent stop and go conditions. An automatic gearbox in the BMW X3 F25 with gears in the amount of 8 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better choice.