BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

23 reasons for

BMW X3 F25, model available from 2010.
It has sDrive20i 184HP ic petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
BMW

23 reasons for BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184KM automat in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

184 > 115 hp
The BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic is equipped with petrol which delivers by 60 % more horsepower over the the engine of the Nissan Qashqai II, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be googd car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

271 > 190 Nm
Due to 81 newton meters more torque, the engine of the BMW X3 F25 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Nissan. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.2 > 11.3 s
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the BMW X3 F25 fits you better as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 27 % faster than the Nissan Qashqai II.
33

Top speed

210 > 183 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the BMW X3 F25 is higher as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 27 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,255 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s performance. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is good to check a torque graph.
22

Width

1,881 > 1,800 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The BMW X3 F25 is widther by 5 % in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” class equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 5 percent smaller than the same feature of the BMW X3 F25.
19

Fuel tank

66 > 54 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the BMW X3 F25 that can contain 22 % more fuel compared with the Nissan Qashqai II. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic comes from, is 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Nissan) it amounts to 61 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,809 > 2,644 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. BMW X3 F25 has 165 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Nissan. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of BMW X3 F25 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

8 > 6 gears
The BMW X3 F25 have a higher gear count compared to the Nissan Qashqai II which means that BMW X3 F25 should achieve faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not even observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,198 cc
The engine capacity of the BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic is by 67 percent larger when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the BMW X3 F25 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,652 > 4,380 mm
The BMW X3 F25 is 6 percent longer than the Nissan. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The BMW X3 F25 very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the BMW X3 F25 will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,631 > 1,563 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
1

Height

1,676 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the BMW X3 F25, which is by 5 % higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift with which the Nissan is equipped is more simpler construction and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable because it requires the driver to put on clutch to shift gears very often, especialy in a congested city traffic where we have lots of frequent stop and go conditions. An automatic gearbox in the BMW X3 F25 with gears in the amount of 8 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better choice.
0

Rim width

7 > 6 mm
0

Payload

2,267 > 1,860 kg
0

Rim diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Front track

1,619 > 1,564 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,750 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

9 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 19 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, being palced in „compact SUV” class uses by 1.9 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 9.2 l
The Nissan burns up 2.3 l less fuel in urban cycle in relation to the BMW. The difference at the level of 2.3 l is very big in daily use of car. Additionally, within many months it will bring huge savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6 l
19

Range

982 > 944 km
12

Urban range

797 > 744 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 1,098 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 515 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2010
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Nissan Qashqai II may feature more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

BMW X3 F25 sDrive20i 184HP automatic Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,199 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2010 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Code name F25 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK