The BMW X5 E53 is equipped with petrol which delivers by 107 more horsepower than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be googd car for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
Thanks to 126 newton meters more torque, the engine of the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 accelerates to 100k\h
quicker in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. A significant difference in
acceleration in favor of the BMW will allow him to overtake much
faster and avoid other obstacles.
The BMW X5 E53 has by
30 percent higher top
velocity in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, consequently a long route, for example
when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be
drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
distance between left and right side of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability while driving. The width of the BMW is larger by 87 mm in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” segment amounts to 1,866 millimeters and is by 2 mm smaller than the same feature of the BMW X5 E53.
In this category it is the BMW X5 E53 which can carry 34 liters more fuel compared with the Ford. The average fuel container capacity in the full-size SUV segment, which is represented by the BMW, equals 84 l, whereas in full-size SUV segment (represented by the Ford Maverick II) it is 84 liters.
The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 has 201 millimeters longer wheelbase than Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Consequently the BMW X5 E53 is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
Number of gears
The BMW X5 E53 has only one extra
speed compared to the
Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Sometimes this
extra gear is a taller one so that the previous
gears can be narrower to
give better acceleration in the
lower speeds. One more speed also will result in smaller
fuel consumption and CO2 output.
The engine cubic capacity of the BMW X5 E53 is by 988 cc larger when compared to the Ford. As a result the Ford Maverick II will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
Maximum load capacity
The BMW X5 E53 is 270 mm longer in comparison to the Ford. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The BMW X5 E53 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .