BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

24 reasons for

BMW X5 E53, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0i 231HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
BMW

24 reasons for BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

231 > 124 hp
The BMW X5 E53 is equipped with petrol which delivers by 107 more horsepower than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be googd car for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

301 > 175 Nm
Thanks to 126 newton meters more torque, the engine of the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.3 > 13.5 s
The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 accelerates to 100k\h 5.2 s quicker in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the BMW will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

215 > 166 km/h
The BMW X5 E53 has by 30 percent higher top velocity in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, consequently a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference may be noticeable during travelling on the road without speed limits.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,505 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,868 > 1,781 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability while driving. The width of the BMW is larger by 87 mm in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” segment amounts to 1,866 millimeters and is by 2 mm smaller than the same feature of the BMW X5 E53.
19

Range

724 > 592 km
19

Fuel tank

91 > 57 l
In this category it is the BMW X5 E53 which can carry 34 liters more fuel compared with the Ford. The average fuel container capacity in the full-size SUV segment, which is represented by the BMW, equals 84 l, whereas in full-size SUV segment (represented by the Ford Maverick II) it is 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,820 > 2,619 mm
The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 has 201 millimeters longer wheelbase than Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Consequently the BMW X5 E53 is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

517 > 443 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW X5 E53 has only one extra speed compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Sometimes this extra gear is a taller one so that the previous gears can be narrower to give better acceleration in the lower speeds. One more speed also will result in smaller fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

2,978 > 1,990 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the BMW X5 E53 is by 988 cc larger when compared to the Ford. As a result the Ford Maverick II will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

610 > 470 kg
6

Length

4,664 > 4,394 mm
The BMW X5 E53 is 270 mm longer in comparison to the Ford. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The BMW X5 E53 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,530 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Payload

2,605 > 1,936 kg
0

Front track

1,579 > 1,552 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,994 > 1,469 kg

Ford

7 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.8 > 12.5 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Ford's advantage. This vehicle consumes 22 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared with the BMW. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the large off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Ford is classified, is 12.2 l whereas the Ford Maverick II needs by 20 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 18 l
The fuel economy in city traffic is considerably to the Ford's advantage. This vehicle consumes 26 % less fuel running around the town in relation to the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4. Better fuel consumption means an increase in cruising range.
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 465 l
The boot of the Ford Maverick II is 520 liters larger in comparison to the BMW X5 E53. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Ford will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can load.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,941 > 1,548 l
1

Height

1,722 > 1,707 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Ford Maverick II, which is by 1 percent higher than the BMW, is appropriate option for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E53 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK