Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual vs BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

22 reasons for

Lincoln Navigator II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 5.4 i V8 304HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

BMW X5 E53, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0i 231HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4
Lincoln

22 reasons for Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304KM manual in comparison to BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 231 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Lincoln that has by 73 more horsepower when compared to the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4. Consequently the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual will reach higher maximum speed. Due to more horsepower the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual will also give noticeably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

507 > 465 l
The boot of the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual is only 9 percent bigger than the BMW. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have similar trunk size.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,965 > 1,548 l
22

Width

2,037 > 1,868 mm
Width of a vehicle affects interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual is larger by 9 percent compared with the BMW and is not really relevant. The average for the „large SUV” segment is approximately 1,866 mm and is by 171 millimeters smaller than the width of the Lincoln.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 91 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Lincoln Navigator II which is able to take by 14 l more gasoline in relation to the BMW X5 E53.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,820 mm
Lincoln has 7 % longer wheelbase than the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
12

Urban range

541 > 517 km
8

Engine capacity

5,398 > 2,978 cc
The Lincoln Navigator II has 2,420 cubic centimeters larger cubic capacity in comparison to the BMW X5 E53. The difference is substantia. For this reason the Lincoln Navigator II should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size equals worst fuel economy.
6

Length

5,228 > 4,664 mm
The Lincoln Navigator II is 564 mm longer when compared to the BMW X5 E53. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Lincoln probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Lincoln will be better driven but the BMW X5 E53 will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,704 > 1,576 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a better version of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is a better choice. Engine of V type installed in a vehicle the Lincoln Navigator II produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2002 > 2000
Given that the BMW X5 E53 debuted only 2 years earlier than the Lincoln, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Lincoln Navigator II may feature a bit more modern solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,975 > 1,707 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Lincoln Navigator II, which is by 268 millimeters higher than the BMW X5 E53, is appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

255 > 235 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,305 > 2,605 kg
0

Front track

1,701 > 1,579 mm
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Curb weight

2,701 > 1,994 kg

BMW

5 reasons for BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

18 > 19.6 l
The BMW consumes of 8 percent petrol fewer in the urban cycle than the Lincoln. The BMW X5 E53, as a representative of large off-road 4x4 segment, consumes 3.2 l per 100 km more than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “large SUV” segment equals to 14.8 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.3 > 9.3 s
A little difference amounts to 11 percent shows that the Lincoln Navigator II is insensibly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large off-road 4x4” segment, to which the Lincoln Navigator II is assigned, the medium acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 1.2 s slower than acceleration of Lincoln’s car.
33

Top speed

215 > 170 km/h
The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual has by 26 percent lower top speed than the BMW X5 E53, on account of which driving a long distance, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference might be perceptible during travelling on fast and long routes to the vehicle of BMW brand advantage.
8

Maximum load capacity

610 > 605 kg
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - E53
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK