BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 vs Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

23 reasons for

BMW X5 E53, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0i 231HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Mazda Tribute I, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
BMW

23 reasons for BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

231 > 124 hp
The BMW has by 86 % more horsepower in relation to Mazda Tribute I. The BMW will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to grater power. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.3 > 13.7 s
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the BMW X5 E53 fits you better as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 39 % better in comparison to the Mazda.
38

Trunk capacity

465 > 368 l
The BMW X5 E53 has 97 l larger boot compared with the Mazda. Such a difference is quite significant so it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the BMW X5 E53 has 290 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its class. Larger trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

215 > 166 km/h
The Mazda has by 30 percent lower top speed in comparison to the BMW, because of which passing a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference may be perceptible during running over highways to the vehicle of BMW brand advantage.
22

Width

1,868 > 1,795 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The BMW X5 E53 is 73 millimeters wider than the Mazda. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

724 > 588 km
19

Fuel tank

91 > 57 l
The Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 gives way to the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 is able to hold by 60 % more fuel compared with its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,820 > 2,622 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. BMW has 8 percent longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mazda Tribute I. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of BMW should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

517 > 442 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 has only one extra speed in relation to the Mazda. Generally this extra speed is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower to give increased acceleration in the lower speeds. One more speed also affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

2,978 > 1,989 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the BMW X5 E53 is by 50 % bigger in relation to the Mazda Tribute I. As a result the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the BMW will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

610 > 490 kg
6

Length

4,664 > 4,395 mm
The BMW X5 E53 is 6 percent longer in relation to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The BMW X5 E53 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the BMW will be better driven ,however, the Mazda will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,550 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Payload

2,605 > 1,986 kg
0

Front track

1,579 > 1,553 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,994 > 1,490 kg

Mazda

6 reasons for Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.5 > 12.5 l
The Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 consumes 3 l fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the BMW X5 E53. The difference at the level of 3 liters will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it will result in a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

12.7 > 18 l
The Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 consumes 5.3 l less petrol running around the town when compared to the BMW X5 E53. The difference in the amount of 5.3 l is quite significant in daily usage of the car. But, in a long run it will even give you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,247 > 1,548 l
1

Height

1,710 > 1,707 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Mazda Tribute I, which is by 3 millimeters higher than the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E53 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK