BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

BMW X5 E53, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0i 231HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

1 reason for

Mitsubishi Pajero III, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0 V6 177HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP
BMW

11 reasons for BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

231 > 177 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the BMW that has by 31 % more horsepower in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero III. As a result the BMW will reach higher top speed. Because of more horsepower the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 should as well provide better flexiblility in specific gears.
38

Trunk capacity

465 > 415 l
The boot of the BMW X5 E53 is only 12 percent bigger than the Mitsubishi Pajero III. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk space.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,548 > 1,255 l
22

Width

1,868 > 1,778 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The BMW X5 E53 is widther only by 90 mm than the Mitsubishi Pajero III and is not really relevant. The average for the „full-size SUV” segment equals to 1,866 mm and is by 2 millimeters larger than the width of the BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

91 > 70 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is BMW that is able to carry by 30 percent more fuel in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero III.
15

Wheelbase

2,820 > 2,727 mm
The BMW X5 E53 has 3 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero III. Consequently the BMW X5 E53 is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
6

Length

4,664 > 4,613 mm
The BMW X5 E53 is 1 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the BMW will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,576 > 1,480 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door BMW X5 E53 is more convenient and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Pajero III generally look much cooler and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Pajero III might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Front track

1,579 > 1,464 mm

Mitsubishi

1 reason for Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177KM in comparison to BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
1

Height

1,737 > 1,707 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Mitsubishi Pajero III, which is by 30 mm higher than the BMW X5 E53, is appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E53 3.0i 231HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E53 -
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK