BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic vs Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

BMW X5 E70 M SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 4.4 V8 555HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

5 reasons for

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, model available from 2010.
It has 3.6 V6 286HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
BMW

19 reasons for BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555KM automat in comparison to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

555 > 286 hp
The BMW has 94 percent more horsepower in relation to Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. The BMW X5 E70 M SUV will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate thanks to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for the BMW X5 E70 M SUV equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

681 > 349 Nm
The BMW X5 E70 M SUV has 332 newton meters more torque in relation to the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV. The difference at this level is quite big, what means that the BMW X5 E70 M SUV will be seeding up perceptibly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

4.7 > 9.1 s
If a swift driving is what you enjoy, the BMW fits you better because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 4.4 s faster in comparison to the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,752 > 1,546 l
33

Top speed

250 > 206 km/h
The maximum speed of the BMW X5 E70 M SUV is greater as compared to this of the Jeep which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 21 percent is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,505 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic. The engine of the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV achieves its full efficiency at 4,300 revolutions per minute which is by 2,795 revolutions/minute worst result than the BMW X5 E70.
22

Width

1,994 > 1,943 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the BMW X5 E70 is larger only by 51 millimeters compared with the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4 and is not really important. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” segment amounts to around 1,866 mm and is by 7 percent smaller than the width of the BMW X5 E70 M SUV.
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,908 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable car's weight distribution. BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic has 25 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Jeep. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,394 > 3,605 cc
The BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic has by 789 cc bigger engine displacement than the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,846 > 4,822 mm
The BMW is 24 millimeters longer in relation to the Jeep. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the BMW X5 E70 M SUV seems to be better choice for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Jeep may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,672 > 1,634 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

275 > 265 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,350 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,658 > 1,628 mm
0

Valves

32 > 22
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,201 > 2,154 mm
0

Tire profile

40 > 50 %

Jeep

5 reasons for Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286KM automat 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

11.4 > 13.7 l
The Jeep uses 17 % less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the BMW X5 E70 M SUV. The difference at the level of 2.3 l is not very appreciable. However in the long run it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
38

Trunk capacity

782 > 620 l
With more trunk space the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle than the BMW X5 E70. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV will be better to choose as it is around 26 % more spacious than the trunk of its contender.
1

Model release date

2010 > 2006
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV may feature more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,766 > 1,764 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Jeep Grand Cherokee IV, which is by 2 millimeters higher than the BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic, is appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Curb weight

2,343 > 2,307 kg

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E70 M SUV 4.4 V8 555HP automatic Jeep Grand Cherokee IV 3.6 V6 286HP automatic 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Code name E70 WK2
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK