Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 vs BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

15 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has xDrive30d 245HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4
Land Rover

15 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340KM automat 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

340 > 245 hp
The Land Rover has by 95 hp more horsepower in relation to BMW X5 E70. The Land Rover Range Rover IV will be distinctly faster accelerate thanks to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also leaving behind other vehicles while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Land Rover equipped with more powerful engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.3 > 7.6 s
A small difference amounts to 4 % indicates that the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is insensibly beaten here. In the „large 4x4 ” class, to which the BMW is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 2.9 s slower than acceleration of BMW’s vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

909 > 650 l
With more luggage capacity the Land Rover Range Rover IV will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull car than the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting. If the size of the trunk is appeals to you, the Land Rover Range Rover IV will be better to choose as it is about 40 percent more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,031 > 1,872 l
22

Width

2,073 > 1,933 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Land Rover is widther by 140 mm than the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large SUV” segment is approximately 1,866 mm and is by 207 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV.
19

Fuel tank

104 > 84 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Land Rover which can take by 24 percent more fuel in relation to the BMW X5 E70.
8

Engine capacity

2,994 > 2,992 cc
The Land Rover has by 2 cc larger engine capacity than the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

4,999 > 4,852 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV is 3 % longer than the BMW. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Land Rover Range Rover IV very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Land Rover Range Rover IV will be better driven ,however, the BMW will be a little easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,681 > 1,650 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a developed version of a In-line engine which as far as we are concerned is with more adventages. Engine of V type inside a vehicle the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may contain high numbers of cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Manufacture of the older car started 6 years prior to its rival hence it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle gives way to Land Rover because it has significantly less modern solutions used.
1

Height

1,836 > 1,776 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference of 3 % in favor of the Land Rover is not big and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Land Rover in spite of having a few minuses offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be more rested. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,690 > 1,642 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,225 > 2,201 mm

BMW

10 reasons for BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 12.5 l
The fuel economy is considerably to BMW's advantage. This automobile uses 5.3 l less diesel in the mixed cycle when compared with the Land Rover Range Rover IV. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the large 4x4 class, in which the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is classified, is 12.2 l while the BMW consumes by 41 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

541 > 448 Nm
Maximum torque of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is 21 % greater than the Land Rover Range Rover IV. As a result, the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 will accelerate slightly faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 will use less fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

8.9 > 14.5 l
The fuel economy while driving inside city is distinctly to the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting's advantage. This car uses 39 % less oil in the urban cycle when compared to the Land Rover Range Rover IV. Better fuel consumption means less fuel cost passed on you.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 3,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached tells us how fast an engine reaches its best performance with increase in revolutions. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.6 > 10.7 l
19

Range

1,149 > 827 km
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,926 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. BMW X5 E70 has 7 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Land Rover Range Rover IV. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

977 > 714 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,269 > 981 km
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 3,496 kg
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2012 2006
    Facelifting no yes
    Code name - E70
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK