BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

26 reasons for

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has xDrive30d 245HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 MIVEC 250HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
BMW

26 reasons for BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 13.7 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting's advantage. This car uses 6.5 l less oil in the mixed cycle than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the large SUV segment, in which the BMW is classified, equals to 12.2 l while the BMW uses by 41 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

541 > 327 Nm
Thanks to 65 percent greater torque, the engine of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

8.9 > 17.7 l
The BMW X5 E70 uses 8.8 l fewer fuel in urban cycle compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 8.8 l will be quite significant in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, within years it will bring gigantic cost savings. Moreover keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably increased if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 10.8 s
If a swift driving is what you are really in to, the BMW fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 30 percent better in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d.
38

Trunk capacity

650 > 415 l
The BMW has 235 liters more capable boot compared with the Mitsubishi. Such a difference is significant so it will is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting has 105 l bigger trunk size than the average in its segment. Larger boot will be useful during family journeys and also during everyday driving.
33

Top speed

210 > 200 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is greater than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d by 10 kilometers per hour, which allows the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 to travel quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 10 kilometers per hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 2,745 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its full output with increase in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.6 > 11.2 l
22

Width

1,933 > 1,877 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The BMW X5 E70 is widther by 3 percent compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero IV and is not really important. The medium for the „large SUV” segment equals to approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 % larger than the same attribute of the BMW.
19

Range

1,149 > 511 km
19

Fuel tank

84 > 68 l
The Mitsubishi is worst that the BMW in the category of fuel tank capacity. The BMW is able to hold by 24 % more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero IV.
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,546 mm
The BMW has 387 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. As a result the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

977 > 390 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,269 > 616 km
6

Length

4,852 > 4,385 mm
The BMW is 11 % longer when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. Long vehicles more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting seems to be better option for families or drivers who value convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 may appeal to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,650 > 1,557 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door BMW X5 E70 is more usable and if you frequently travel with more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi very often look much cooler and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Pajero IV might be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Rim width

8 > 7 mm
0

Rim diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Front track

1,642 > 1,560 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Rear overhang

1,062 > 1,073 mm
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250KM automat 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

250 > 245 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Mitsubishi which has by 5 horsepower more in relation to the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting, which makes this vehicle slightly faster. With more horsepower the Mitsubishi will also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
8

Engine capacity

3,827 > 2,992 cc
The Mitsubishi Pajero IV has 28 percent bigger cubic capacity in relation to the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Mitsubishi should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

695 > 605 kg
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a developed construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is a better choice. Engine of V type installed inside a vehicle the Mitsubishi gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

265 > 255 mm
1

Height

1,848 > 1,776 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 72 millimeters higher than the BMW, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission with which the BMW X5 E70 is equipped is more simpler built and is cheaper in use, however, also it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to put on clutch to change speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a in rush hour in urban traffic where drivers have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic gearbox installed in the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 with 5 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better to use.
0

Payload

2,910 > 2,756 kg
0

Front overhang

765 > 864 mm
0

Curb weight

2,217 > 2,152 kg

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 3,496 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E70 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK