BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

26 reasons for

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has xDrive30d 245HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
BMW

26 reasons for BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

245 > 178 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting that has by 38 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi. Therefore the BMW X5 E70 is able to achieve higher speed. Because of more horsepower the BMW X5 E70 should also provide noticeably better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

7.2 > 8.4 l
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 uses 1.2 l fewer in the combined cycle when compared to the Mitsubishi. The difference in the amount of 14 % is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless in the long term it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

541 > 398 Nm
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting has 143 newton meters more torque than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. Although the majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it reflects the best how a vehicle acclerates. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is of considerable size hence the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 will provide you with better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

8.9 > 9.8 l
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting uses 0.9 l fewer in the urban cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV. The difference in the amount of 9 percent is not realy noticeable in daily usage of the automobile but within a several months it would give a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 11.7 s
The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 accelerates to 100k\h 35 percent better in relation to the Mitsubishi. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the BMW X5 E70 will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,872 > 1,813 l
33

Top speed

210 > 179 km/h
The top speed of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 17 percent is small and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,755 > 1,995 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is recommended to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.6 > 7.3 l
22

Width

1,933 > 1,813 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 is larger by 7 % than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The average for the „large off-road 4x4” class is approximately 1,866 mm and is by 4 percent smaller than the width of the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting.
19

Range

1,149 > 854 km
19

Fuel tank

84 > 69 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is BMW that is able to hold by 22 percent more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi.
15

Wheelbase

2,933 > 2,806 mm
BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 has 127 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
12

Urban range

977 > 714 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,269 > 959 km
8

Engine capacity

2,992 > 2,476 cc
The BMW X5 E70 has by 516 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Gross trailer weight

3,496 > 2,499 kg
6

Length

4,852 > 4,695 mm
The BMW X5 E70 is 3 % longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,650 > 1,513 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Payload

2,756 > 2,708 kg
0

Front track

1,642 > 1,520 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Rear overhang

1,062 > 1,101 mm
0

Curb weight

2,152 > 2,047 kg

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

714 > 650 l
If you are looking for a vehicles for long cruises, which could room more luggage , choose the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. The BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 has by 64 l less capable boot compared with the BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 so you would be able to put in the trunk a bit less. Assessing the boot also pay attention to its dimensions which have appreciable impact on loading possibility .
8

Maximum load capacity

665 > 605 kg
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Production of the older car started much more earlier than its competitor thus it is reasonable to suppose that this car features not so modern solutions .
1

Height

1,838 > 1,776 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mitsubishi, which is by 3 percent higher than the BMW, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front overhang

797 > 864 mm

Cars specifications

BMW X5 E70 SUV Facelifting xDrive30d 245HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 3,496 kg 2,499 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2012
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name E70 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK