Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160HP vs BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual

Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160HP

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

8 reasons for

Nissan 200SX IV, model available from 1999 to 2002.
It has 2.0 160HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2002.
Drive has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

BMW Z1, model available from 1988 to 1991.
It has 2.5 170HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1991.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual
Nissan

8 reasons for Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160KM in comparison to BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,730 > 1,687 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The Nissan 200SX IV is widther only by 3 percent in relation to the BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the ā€žSā€ class equals to around 1,791 millimeters and is by 3 percent smaller than the width of the Nissan.
15

Wheelbase

2,525 > 2,447 mm
The Nissan 200SX IV has 3 percent longer wheelbase in relation to BMW Z1. As a result the Nissan 200SX IV is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,560 > 3,926 mm
The Nissan 200SX IV is 634 millimeters longer when compared to the BMW Z1. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan 200SX IV very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Nissan will be better driven ,however, the BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .
1

Model release date

1999 > 1988
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than its competitor and for this reason we may expect that this car has not so modern technologies .
1

Height

1,293 > 1,277 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Nissan 200SX IV, which is by 1 percent higher than the BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual, would be appropriate choice for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

4 > 2
0

Front track

1,480 > 1,456 mm
0

End of model sale

2002 > 1991

BMW

3 reasons for BMW Z1 2.5 170KM manual in comparison to Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 160 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the BMW which has by 6 percent horsepower more in relation to the Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160HP, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. With more horsepower the BMW should also give somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
4

Rear track

1,473 > 1,468 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular

Cars specifications

Nissan 200SX IV 2.0 160HP BMW Z1 2.5 170HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1999 1988
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload - 1,463 kg

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK